GNU bug report logs - #76503
[GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Full log


Message #299 received at 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>,
 ludo <at> gnu.org, Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>,
 Andrew Wong <wongandj <at> icloud.com>, slade <at> lambda-y.net, 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 guix <at> cbaines.net, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [bug#76503] [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches
 to Codeberg
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:59:59 +0100
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, 07 Mar 2025 at 19:07, Ricardo Wurmus 
> <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:
>
>>     https://codeberg.org/org/guix-science/pulls?\
>>         type=review_requested&\
>>         sort=recentupdate&\
>>         state=open&\
>>         q=&fuzzy=true
>
> For instance, this is listed for me:
>
>     https://codeberg.org/guix-science/guix-science-nonfree/pulls/30
>
> and…
>
>> Reviews can automatically be requested via the CODEOWNERS file, 
>> so 
>> I think moulding our workflow around this overview would be an 
>> obvious improvement.
>
> …and maybe I misread CODEOWNERS [1], but I miss why this PR is 
> listed
> for me.
>
> 1: 
> https://codeberg.org/guix-science/guix-science-nonfree/src/branch/master/CODEOWNERS

I don't see that your review has been requested for this PR.  No 
idea
what's up there.

-- 
Ricardo




This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.