GNU bug report logs - #76503
[GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Full log


Message #23 received at 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrew Wong <wongandj <at> icloud.com>
To: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
Cc: rekado <at> elephly.net, arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net, ludo <at> gnu.org,
 slade <at> lambda-y.net, 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix <at> cbaines.net
Subject: Re: [bug#76503] [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues,
 and patches to Codeberg
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:37:25 -0500
> On Feb 25, 2025, at 10:04 AM, Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Still, I wonder how Github
> educated people, reluctant to email exchange, will react to a
> 
>    git push origin HEAD:refs/for/<target-branch>/<session>
> 
> based workflow, and if this really lowers the barrier to entry[1].
The linked page refers to a tool called “git-repo”, which smooths out the more technical bits to commands like “git pr”. From appearances it seems like using this tool is lower-investment for users than configuring (or changing!) their email client to interact with mailing lists and the mail-in patch workflow properly. It also helps that this (optional?) special tool is more “orthogonal” to other workflows, rather than involving something as central as emails.



This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.