GNU bug report logs -
#76503
[GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg
Previous Next
Full log
Message #104 received at 76503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen <at> fastmail.net> writes:
> Overall, I am very favorable to moving to a forge because of point 1. I
> don't see anything objectively wrong or bad about the current e-mail
> workflow, but for an occasional (or new) contributor its hard to become
> fluent with it. In contrast, forges are becoming standard even for many
> non-coders.
One more point that I forgot: moving to a forge could be even more
beneficial for increasing the number of people reviewing patches. For
submitting a patch, the current workflow is unusual but not so
complicated. For reviewing, I don't even know how to do it, in
particular how to apply and test patches from an e-mail message in a
sufficiently automated way. In contrast, on a forge, I could well
imaging participating in reviewing patches for ecosystems I am familiar
with.
Cheers,
Konrad.
This bug report was last modified 16 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.