GNU bug report logs - #76476
Make cl-first, cl-second, ..., cl-tenth part of Emacs Lisp

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:42:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#76476: closed (Re: bug#76476: Make cl-first, cl-second, ...,
 cl-tenth part of Emacs Lisp)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:34:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#76476: Make cl-first, cl-second, ..., cl-tenth part of Emacs Lisp

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 76476 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
76476: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=76476
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: rms <at> gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: acorallo <at> gnu.org, eliz <at> gnu.org, 76476-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#76476: Make cl-first, cl-second, ...,
 cl-tenth part of Emacs Lisp
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:33:41 +0000
Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org> writes:

>   > >     first
>   > >     second
>   > >     third
>   > >     fourth
>   > >     fifth
>   > >     sixth
>   > >     seventh
>   > >     eight
>   > >     ninth
>   > >     tenth
>   > >     rest
>
>   > FWIW, I hate those even more than the `cadar` thingies.  🙂
>
> I agree -- most of these are no improvement.  They don't make programs
> simpler.
>
> We no longer have a need to strain to keep the number of function
> names in GNU Emacs as small as possible.  But that doesn't mean
> we should add every function that could be meaningful.
> Some meaningful functions are not worth the work of documenting them.

Thanks.  It appears that this change isn't gaining much support.

I'm therefore closing this bug report now.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Make cl-first, cl-second, ..., cl-tenth part of Emacs Lisp
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:40:46 +0000
Severity: wishlist

I propose making the following functions from cl-lib.el a part of
Emacs Lisp proper (i.e. defined in subr.el):

    first
    second
    third
    fourth
    fifth
    sixth
    seventh
    eight
    ninth
    tenth
    rest

This would allow converting code such as:

    (mapcar (lambda (thing) (car (cdr (cdr (cdr thing))))) ...)
    (mapcar (lambda (thing) (cadddr thing)) ...)
    (mapcar (lambda (thing) (nth 3 thing)) ...)

to the IMHO, more direct and readable:

    (mapcar #'fourth ...)

I'm adding `rest' to the list as well, as the natural corollary to
`first'.

Which would be used is obviously situational, and should be left to
whoever is touching that code.  There is no general need to "upgrade"
old code to prefer these new functions.

Thoughts?



This bug report was last modified 142 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.