GNU bug report logs - #76473
31.0.50; gnutls_pproc leak

Previous Next

Full log

Message #22 received at 76473 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 76473 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#76473: 31.0.50; gnutls_pproc leak
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:58:19 +0000

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:44:17 +0000
>> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
>> Cc: eller.helmut <at> gmail.com, 76473 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> >> Cc: 76473 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> >> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:02:34 +0000
>> >> From:  Pip Cet via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> >>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> > This patch would fix that:
>> >>
>> >> I believe it would!  Is anyone testing the w32/w64 + gnutls combination?
>> >
>> > In general, or on the igc branch?
>>
>> The latter.  This bug is specific to feature/igc, I think, since that's
>> the only branch that has gnutls_pproc.
>
> If you or Helmut tell me what to try and what to notice, I can do
> that.

Can you watch the PVEC_PROCESS line (in M-x igc-stats) or the
xzalloc-ambig line (in M-x igc-roots-stats) while creating and
destroying a number of gnutls processes?

Without the patch, the numbers should go up but never down.  With the
patch, all should be fine :-)

Thanks!
Pip

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.