GNU bug report logs -
#76446
[Patch Debbugs] Infrastructure Improvements
Previous Next
Full log
Message #17 received at 76446 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com> writes:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/.dir-locals.el
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +;;; Directory Local Variables -*- no-byte-compile: t -*-
> +;;; For more information see (info "(emacs) Directory Variables")
> +
> +((emacs-lisp-mode . ((checkdoc-package-keywords-flag . t)
> + (checkdoc-ispell-lisp-words
> + .
> + ("ChangeLog" "ChangeLogs" "UTF" "alist" "args"
> + "armstrong" "backend" "bcc" "bugreport" "cdate" "cedet"
> + "coreutils" "cygwin" "debbugs" "debian" "el" "emacs"
> + "etags" "freemail" "fsf" "guix" "gw" "henoch" "hu"
> + "hyperestraier" "keymap" "magit" "magnus" "maint"
> + "maintainer" "maintainer's" "mbox" "mboxes" "minibuffer"
> + "moreinfo" "multibyte" "notabug" "paren" "persistency"
> + "regexp" "rescan" "rgm" "rmail" "severities" "sexp"
> + "solaris" "src" "sublist" "submitter" "submitter's"
> + "subproduct" "subqueries" "subquery" "teardown"
> + "unarchived" "unibyte" "unreproducible" "url" "util"
> + "wishlist" "wontfix" "wsdl" "www" "xsd" "zltuz")))))
This is needed for the checkdoc target in make only, isn't it? Shouldn't
we activate it for just this case?
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> +checkdoc: $(SOURCE) $(TESTSOURCE)
> + @$(EMACS) -Q --batch "--eval=(setq enable-local-variables :all \
> + checkdoc-spellcheck-documentation-flag t)" \
> + -L . $(foreach file,$^,"--eval=(checkdoc-file \"$(file)\")")
Do we need '-L .'?
Best regards, Michael.
This bug report was last modified 72 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.