From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:13:28 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#7643 <7643@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#7643 <7643@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Build failure for SGI IRIX MIPS Reply-To: bug#7643 <7643@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:13:28 +0000 retitle 7643 Build failure for SGI IRIX MIPS reassign 7643 emacs submitter 7643 beebe@math.utah.edu severity 7643 important tag 7643 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 20:35:16 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2010 01:35:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSgGx-0006ly-94 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:35:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSgGv-0006lo-Ut for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:35:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PSgMy-0004Rc-0q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:41:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:34665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PSgMx-0004RY-Us for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:41:27 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45133 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PSgMw-0000gM-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:41:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PSgMv-0004R3-Ge for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:41:26 -0500 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]:33906) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PSgMv-0004Qz-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:41:25 -0500 Received: from furball (bb121-6-218-24.singnet.com.sg [121.6.218.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBF1fMgQ009779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:41:24 -0500 Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E022A1604BC; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:41:20 -0500 (EST) From: Chong Yidong To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Build failure for SGI IRIX MIPS References: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:41:20 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Nelson H. F. Beebe's message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:09:29 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <8739pzx16n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) Nelson H. F. Beebe reports a build failure of the 23.2.92 pretest on SGI IRIX MIPS. The last Emacs version to build ok was 21.3 in January 2004, so this appears to be a long-standing bug. > On IRIX, compilation fails in src/process.c like this: > > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2431 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > uint16_t *ip6 = (uint16_t *) &sin6->sin6_addr; > ^ > > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2432 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > len = sizeof (sin6->sin6_addr)/2 + 1; > ^ > > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2435 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > p->contents[--len] = make_number (ntohs (sin6->sin6_port)); > ^ > > cc-1070 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2489 > The indicated type is incomplete. > > return sizeof (struct sockaddr_in6); > ^ > > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2546 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > uint16_t *ip6 = (uint16_t *)&sin6->sin6_addr; > ^ > > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2547 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > len = sizeof (sin6->sin6_addr) + 1; > ^ > > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2549 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > sin6->sin6_port = htons (i); > ^ > > cc-1070 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 4388 > The indicated type is incomplete. > > struct sockaddr_in6 in6; > ^ > > 8 errors detected in the compilation of "process.c". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 08 15:35:49 2011 Received: (at 7643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2011 20:35:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbfVt-0002ZI-CH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:35:49 -0500 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbfVr-0002Z6-KX for 7643@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:35:48 -0500 Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p08Kh7dK013193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:43:07 -0500 Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2ED9161EAC; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:43:06 -0500 (EST) From: Chong Yidong To: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" Subject: Re: bug#7643: Build failure for SGI IRIX MIPS Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:43:06 -0500 Message-ID: <8739p3w2hx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7643 Cc: 7643@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2431 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > uint16_t *ip6 = (uint16_t *) &sin6->sin6_addr; > ... > cc-1367 c89: ERROR File = process.c, Line = 2435 > A pointer to an incomplete class type is not allowed. > > p->contents[--len] = make_number (ntohs (sin6->sin6_port)); This is a bit of a long shot, but could you check if this maching has uint16_t defined? Also, what is the definition of sockaddr_in6 in netinet/in.h and the definition of ntohs in arpa/inet.h? On GNU/Linux, they are struct sockaddr_in6 { __SOCKADDR_COMMON (sin6_); in_port_t sin6_port; /* Transport layer port # */ uint32_t sin6_flowinfo; /* IPv6 flow information */ struct in6_addr sin6_addr; /* IPv6 address */ uint32_t sin6_scope_id; /* IPv6 scope-id */ }; uint16_t ntohs(uint16_t netshort); but maybe they are defined differently in IRIX. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 07 05:21:21 2011 Received: (at 7643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2011 09:21:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6cK-0007di-3x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:21:21 -0400 Received: from snape.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de ([129.70.160.84] helo=smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6cH-0007dR-9n for 7643@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:21:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A52DFD; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:20:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5oEmj0CPHWSj; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E78BDFC; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id p979KukX006924; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:20:56 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE: ro set sender to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE using -f From: Rainer Orth To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#9684: Emacs 23.3 and 24.0.90 don't build on IRIX 6.5 References: Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:20:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:49:32 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7643 Cc: 7643@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) [Cc'ing to the correct bug.] Glenn Morris writes: > If you have an SGI IRIX, maybe you could help out with > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7643 ? > > The original submitter never replied. I can at least try... > Though presumably you don't see that problem since the C build completed > for you (also I'm not sure if you are using the same kind of system). I fear that's exactly the problem: IPv6 support was only added in a later update of IRIX 6.5 (don't recall exactly which one), so without knowing what Nelson is (was) running, it's hard to tell. Maybe emacs assumes IPv6 support unconditionally (or the test was insufficient)? I did have various problems building 23.3 on 6.5.30 myself, but nothing related to IPv6. I didn't try with cc, though. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 07 14:48:41 2011 Received: (at 7643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2011 18:48:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RCFTM-0008Gf-SQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:48:41 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RCFTI-0008GW-BM for 7643@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RCFT1-0005cw-Ir; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:48:19 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Rainer Orth Subject: Re: bug#7643: Build failure for SGI IRIX MIPS References: X-Spook: SAFE AVN Tony Blair Lexis-Nexis Ortega Rule Psix spies X-Ran: 8-2:E'q0]jAU^[V3e[|y[|/K=S\2H_`m3>?S9I\5+Wr%U:W\Qz3k~s*Vq{v~dcA);bRyc. X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:48:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Rainer Orth's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:20:56 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7643 Cc: 7643@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Rainer Orth wrote: > I fear that's exactly the problem: IPv6 support was only added in a > later update of IRIX 6.5 (don't recall exactly which one), so without > knowing what Nelson is (was) running, it's hard to tell. Maybe emacs > assumes IPv6 support unconditionally (or the test was insufficient)? Thanks for looking at this. However, all the relevant places in process.c seems to be inside #ifdef AF_INET6, where AF_INET6 is defined by the system headers, not by Emacs. So if IPv6 support is not present these sections should never be seen. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 07 15:19:21 2011 Received: (at 7643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2011 19:19:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RCFx1-0000XE-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:19:21 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RCFwz-0000X7-9g for 7643@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:19:18 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RCFwi-0007Hf-57; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:19:00 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 7643@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7643: Build failure for SGI IRIX MIPS References: X-Spook: Indigo Ortega FTS2000 Project Monarch president X-Ran: d4766S9N_7d,lGvc%V$W=36AC"z[=fZoBy3^]'Rh!}wc[Itu`]CD.srVHn/V|#:+hn%-^q X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:18:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:48:19 -0400") Message-ID: <4x39f4bof0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7643 Cc: Rainer Orth X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Web search suggests maybe some IRIXs need -DINET6? http://www.mail-archive.com/openpkg-users@openpkg.org/msg02606.html From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 09 20:08:17 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2011 00:08:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RD3Pk-0006M2-Aq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:08:17 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RD3Ph-0006Lu-2l for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:08:13 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RD3PY-0005DW-Eh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:08:04 -0400 Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:08:04 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 7643 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) submitter 7643 beebe@math.utah.edu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 10 13:54:46 2011 Received: (at 7643-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2011 17:54:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDK3q-0000dg-AB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:54:46 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDK3o-0000da-Iq for 7643-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:54:45 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDK3b-00006j-36; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:54:31 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 7643-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7643: Build failure for SGI IRIX MIPS References: <8739pzx16n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8739p3w2hx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Spook: BRLO InfoSec SSL SHA industrial intelligence Manfurov X-Ran: ?SCN.+Ml98LecQ)xc2Unoey!Km0K\"[.IF!b0.z>G>_Je#GaQo>BzW^="\D}SL2k76/#(" X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:54:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8739p3w2hx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:43:06 -0500") Message-ID: <03sjn0vijt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7643-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) I am afraid that without more input from you or someone else using IRIX who can reproduce this, nothing can be done. At a guess, maybe you need to compile with -DINET6, in which case a patch like the following might fix it. But I don't see the point in installing this without any testing. If you can reply with the contents of netinet/in.h on your system, that might help, and we can reopen this if needed. *** src/process.c 2011-09-09 01:06:52 +0000 --- src/process.c 2011-10-07 21:42:30 +0000 *************** *** 39,44 **** --- 39,51 ---- #include #include + + /* Some (which?) IRIX 6.5 hide IPv6 stuff in in.h behind #ifdef INET6. + See bug#7643. */ + #if defined(AF_INET6) && defined(IRIX6_5) + #define INET6 + #endif + #include #include From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:13:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 08 02:38:57 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2012 06:38:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34274 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ScsqV-0006w2-FR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:38:56 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46863 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ScsqT-0006vv-Dq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:38:54 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ScsoF-0006xs-00 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:36:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:36:35 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 7643 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) unarchive 7643 From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:13:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator