GNU bug report logs - #76242
[PATCH] Clarify that mapconcat's FUNCTION can return nil

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: 76242 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, hong <at> topbug.net
Subject: bug#76242: [PATCH] Clarify that mapconcat's FUNCTION can return nil
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:57:05 +0200

> Cc: hong <at> topbug.net
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 02:27:52 +0100
> From:  Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Hong Xu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text
> editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > -FUNCTION must be a function of one argument, and must return a value
> > -  that is a sequence of characters: either a string, or a vector or
> > -  list of numbers that are valid character codepoints.  */)
> > + FUNCTION must be a function of one argument, and must return either:
> > +
> > +   nil, which is treated as an empty string, or
> > +   a value that is a sequence of characters, which is either a string,
> > +   or a vector or list of numbers that are valid character codepoints. */)
> 
> I don't understand the rationale.  Isn't nil just one case of an empty
> sequence of characters?  Why describe it specially?

How about the below instead:

  FUNCTION must be a function of one argument, and must return a value
    that is a sequence of characters: either a string, or a vector or
    list of numbers that are valid character codepoints; nil is treated
    as an empty string.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.