GNU bug report logs - #76169
home: Add home-restic-backup service.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: paul <goodoldpaul <at> autistici.org>

Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:06:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: paul <goodoldpaul <at> autistici.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 76169 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Andrew Tropin <andrew <at> trop.in>, Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy <at> bioneland.org>, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#76169] home: Add home-restic-backup service.
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:28:22 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Ludo’,

On 2/21/25 15:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> paul<goodoldpaul <at> autistici.org>  skribis:
>
>> It's a good idea, but I was not able to make for-home work with (gnu
>> services configuration) so I changed restic-backup-configuration to a
>> record type from (guix records). It does not impact end user configs
>> in my tests.
> Oh, is it because ‘define-configuration’ does not let you mark fields as
> “innate”?

I'm not sure, from experimentation (calling pk on the field that had 
for-home? as a default value) (for-home (oci-configuration is not able 
to replace for-home? with #t and pk prints #f. I didn't go deep enough 
to figure out why that is. I can put a comment stating that once 
for-home will be able to work with (gnu services configuration) the 
record can be migrated to define-configuration, if you don't find this 
is a blocking issue . I'm sending a new revision rebased on 72803 
rebased on current master. cheers,

giacomo
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 59 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.