GNU bug report logs - #76109
[PATCH] doc: Mention --check --no-grafts as a way to force-rebuild packages.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:45:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #19 received at 76109-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, 76109-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#76109] [PATCH] doc: Mention --check --no-grafts as a way to
 force-rebuild packages.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 20:33:47 +0100
Le ven. 7 févr. 2025 à 20:02, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> a écrit :
> I realized that it would be worthwhile to include a brief explanation of
> why --no-grafts would be necessary here, so I wrote another sentence and
> pushed as 8e9bceda87d55f475992ec5184590463ac7b5ffb

Thanks for the improvement, Leo.

> Thanks for recognizing the need for the documentation and making it
> happen!

I just asked at the "Guile & Guix Errors" session at FOSDEM 2025
during the Guix Days Fringe event, and Ludo shared this hack with me.

(For the record, until now, I have forced package rebuilds by putting
a dummy (write "...") or (format #t "...") in one of the user-defined
modify-phases.)

BTW, I feel like the whole explanation of what grafts and grafting are
could be made a bit clearer—with the help of a picture or something
similar. But that's something for another pull request.

Cheers, Bost




This bug report was last modified 101 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.