GNU bug report logs - #76109
[PATCH] doc: Mention --check --no-grafts as a way to force-rebuild packages.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:45:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, 76109 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#76109] [PATCH] doc: Mention --check --no-grafts as a way to force-rebuild packages.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 02:23:20 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Adjusted! A new patch is attached.

Le ven. 7 févr. 2025 à 01:05, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Rostislav Svoboda wrote:
> > * doc/guix.texi (On Trusting Binaries): Document that combining --check and
> > --no-grafts with 'guix build' forces the rebuild of a package.
>
> Thanks, this is really useful information that most people have had to
> learn by asking.
>
> > +@command{guix build --check}}).  To force a full rebuild of a package
> > +(ignoring security updates via grafts), use @option{--check} together
> > +with @option{--no-grafts} (@pxref{Common Build Options,
> > +@option{--no-grafts}}).
>
> Grafts are not always present in the codebase (hard to believe, I know),
> so can you adjust it to something like "(ignoring security updates via
> grafts, which are often present)"?
[0001-doc-Mention-check-no-grafts-as-a-way-to-force-rebuil.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 101 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.