Subject: Re: bug#76055: 29.4; Doc of string-empty-p

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 14:12:29 +0200

> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:28:00 +0000
> From:  Drew Adams via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <[email-masked]>
> 
> The doc string should tell you that it treats a symbol for arg STRING,
> instead of a string, by checking its `symbol-name'.  E.g., like what is
> done for `string=':
> 
>  Symbols are also allowed; their print names are used instead.
> 
> This should be done for _each_ function where a string is said to be the
> expected arg but where we also allow a symbol.

I'm not sure we want to advertise this, certainly not "for _each_
function".  Who says this is not a side effect of the particular
implementation, which can therefore be changed without notice?