GNU bug report logs - #76034
Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils

Previous Next

Package: diffutils;

Reported by: Santiago Vila <sanvila <at> debian.org>

Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:17:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila <at> debian.org>
Subject: bug#76034: closed (Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#76034: bug#76034:
 Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 03:28:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#76034: Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils

which was filed against the diffutils package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 76034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
76034: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=76034
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon <at> josefsson.org>
Cc: Santiago Vila <sanvila <at> debian.org>, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>,
 76034-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#76034: bug#76034: Status of gnulib-l10n in
 diffutils
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 19:27:04 -0800
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 1:43 PM Simon Josefsson via bug-diffutils via
All diffutils discussion. <bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> writes:
> > On 2/3/25 12:15, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >> So: Will diffutils really do the same at some point?
> >
> > I don't see why not. We didn't get around to it for 3.11, though.
>
> Something like this perhaps?

Thanks, Simon. I've just pushed that.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila <at> debian.org>
To: bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:15:33 +0100
Hello.

After gettext decided to rely on a new package called gnulib-l10n
for the gnulib translations, I believed that diffutils would be next,
but the NEWS file for 3.11 does not say anything about it.

So: Will diffutils really do the same at some point?

Thanks.



This bug report was last modified 103 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.