GNU bug report logs - #76034
Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#76034: closed (Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 03:28:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Feb 2025 19:27:04 -0800
with message-id <CA+8g5KEGTfX=vurQw7k+6=NBTPTsmZHvt1S1Oic9UJXjEOPecg <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#76034: bug#76034: Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #76034,
regarding Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
76034: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=76034
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Santiago Vila <sanvila <at> debian.org>
To: bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Status of gnulib-l10n in diffutils
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:15:33 +0100

Hello.

After gettext decided to rely on a new package called gnulib-l10n
for the gnulib translations, I believed that diffutils would be next,
but the NEWS file for 3.11 does not say anything about it.

So: Will diffutils really do the same at some point?

Thanks.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon <at> josefsson.org>
Cc: Santiago Vila <sanvila <at> debian.org>, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>,
 76034-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#76034: bug#76034: Status of gnulib-l10n in
 diffutils
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 19:27:04 -0800

On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 1:43 PM Simon Josefsson via bug-diffutils via
All diffutils discussion. <bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> writes:
> > On 2/3/25 12:15, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >> So: Will diffutils really do the same at some point?
> >
> > I don't see why not. We didn't get around to it for 3.11, though.
>
> Something like this perhaps?

Thanks, Simon. I've just pushed that.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.