GNU bug report logs -
#75981
[PATCH (WIP) v1 0/4] Add 'guix fork'.
Previous Next
Full log
Message #113 received at 75981 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Montag, dem 24.02.2025 um 12:45 +0000 schrieb 45mg:
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Am Sonntag, dem 23.02.2025 um 18:50 +0530 schrieb 45mg:
> > > (define* (record-configuration repository
> > > + #:optional branch
> > > #:key commit signer keyring-
> > > reference)
> > > "Record COMMIT, SIGNER, and KEYRING-REFERENCE in the 'config'
> > > file
> > > of
> > > -REPOSITORY."
> > > +REPOSITORY, under [guix \"authentication\"].
> > > +If BRANCH is given, record them under [guix \"authentication-
> > > BRANCH\"]."
> > > (define config
> > > (repository-config repository))
> > > + (define section
> > > + (if branch
> > > + (string-append "guix.authentication-" branch)
> > > + "guix.authentication"))
> > >
> > > ;; Guile-Git < 0.7.0 lacks 'set-config-string'.
> > > (if (module-defined? (resolve-interface '(git)) 'set-config-
> > > string)
> > > (begin
> > > - (set-config-string config
> > > "guix.authentication.introduction-
> > > commit"
> > > + (set-config-string config (string-append section
> > > ".introduction-commit")
> > > commit)
> > > - (set-config-string config
> > > "guix.authentication.introduction-
> > > signer"
> > > + (set-config-string config (string-append section
> > > ".introduction-signer")
> > > signer)
> > > - (set-config-string config "guix.authentication.keyring"
> > > + (set-config-string config (string-append section
> > > ".keyring")
> > > keyring-reference)
> > > (info (G_ "introduction and keyring recorded \
> > > in repository configuration file~%")))
> > I would use guix.authentication[.BRANCH].KEY for consistency. Yes,
> > you
> > can use periods in Git config subsection names as per [1]:
> > > Subsection names are case sensitive and can contain any
> > > characters
> > > except newline and the null byte.
>
> This would indeed be cleaner. But as you can see in the diffs for
> `config-value` and guix.texi, 'guix.authentication-BRANCH' was
> already chosen, and I didn't want to break anyone's workflow by
> changing it.
Uhm… if I read this correctly, this is still a patch in progress and
not *that* widely used, no? Is there prior art to go by?
Cheers
This bug report was last modified 172 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.