GNU bug report logs -
#75936
monitor width reporting
Previous Next
Reported by: "david" <david <at> ngdr.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:04:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #8 received at 75936 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: "david" <david <at> ngdr.net>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 17:03:39 -0700
>
> This is a bug that caused me some trouble; but mainly it is FYI. The physical
> arrangement is a laptop, which has a 4K screen, driving a single 4K screen. I
> get (still and always) the different results below from two different Emacs
> builds.
Can you tell more about the differences between these two builds? Are
they builds of the same Emacs version with the same configure-time
switches/options and the same versions of the development tools, or
are any of those factors different between the builds (and if so,
which ones)?
>
> The items below are:
>
> A: code from a startup file; the messages are debug stuff, normally absent, the
> intention behind the code is to compute the aspect ratio of a single monitor.
>
> B and C: output from two different Emacs builds, see ned and nut directories.
> The different widths matter to me because I am computing a ratio that
> later wreak havoc 8-( The creation dates probably matter to you.
> Other than the dates I see no way to differentiate between the builds.
>
> A
> ;; Probably this is not the aspect ratio of the full screen, probably the window manager will keep
> ;; some of the screen for itself.
> (defconst .emacs-monitor-aspect-ratio
> (let ((geometry (assoc 'geometry (frame-monitor-attributes (selected-frame))) ))
> (message (format "geometry %s" geometry))
> (message (format "width %s" (float (nth 3 geometry))))
> (message (format "height %s" (nth 4 geometry)))
> (message (format "pix width %s" (display-pixel-width)))
> (message (format "pix height %s" (display-pixel-height)))
> (message (format "mm width %s" (display-mm-width)))
> (message (format "mm height %s" (display-mm-height)))
> (message (format "screens %s" (display-screens)))
> (message (format "attributes %s" (display-monitor-attributes-list)))
> (message (format "frame atts %s" (frame-monitor-attributes)))
> (/ (float (nth 3 geometry))
> (nth 4 geometry)))
> "*The ratio width/height for the current display screen, calculated in screen pixels.")
>
> B
> .emacs-emacs-directory: /home/dajo/ned/emacs-29.3/
> geometry (geometry 0 0 3840 2160)
> width 3840.0
> height 2160
> pix width 7680
> pix height 2160
> mm width 2032
> mm height 572
> screens 1
> attributes (((name . DP-1) (geometry 0 0 3840 2160) (workarea 0 72 3840 2088) (mm-size 597 336) (frames #<frame *scratch* - GNU Emacs at Aglaea 0x559619a129a8>) (source . XRandR 1.5)) ((name . eDP-1) (geometry 3840 0 3840 2160) (workarea 3840 0 3840 2160) (mm-size 309 173) (frames) (source . XRandR 1.5)))
> frame atts ((name . DP-1) (geometry 0 0 3840 2160) (workarea 0 72 3840 2088) (mm-size 597 336) (frames #<frame *scratch* - GNU Emacs at Aglaea 0x559619a129a8>) (source . XRandR 1.5))
>
> Nepenthes .emacs loading in GNU Emacs 29.3 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, cairo version 1.16.0, Xaw scroll bars)
> of 2024-07-18.
>
> C
> .emacs-emacs-directory: /home/dajo/nut/emacs-29.3/
> geometry (geometry 0 0 7680 2160)
> width 7680.0
> height 2160
> pix width 7680
> pix height 2160
> mm width 2032
> mm height 572
> screens 1
> attributes (((name . combined screen) (geometry 0 0 7680 2160) (workarea 0 72 7680 2088) (mm-size 2032 572) (frames #<frame *scratch* - GNU Emacs at Aglaea 0x5620435c10a8>) (source . fallback)))
> frame atts ((name . combined screen) (geometry 0 0 7680 2160) (workarea 0 72 7680 2088) (mm-size 2032 572) (frames #<frame *scratch* - GNU Emacs at Aglaea 0x5620435c10a8>) (source . fallback))
>
> Nepenthes .emacs loading in GNU Emacs 29.3 (build 3, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, cairo version 1.16.0, Xaw scroll bars)
> of 2025-01-29.
Looks like one of the outputs reports two separate screens, whereas
the other reports a combined screen? If so, aren't the differences
expected? Or what am I missing?
This bug report was last modified 155 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.