GNU bug report logs -
#75805
Request for merging "elogind-updates" branch
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:12:25 +0100
with message-id <877c3q7po6.fsf <at> cbaines.net>
and subject line Re: [bug#75805] Request for merging "elogind-updates" branch
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #75805,
regarding Request for merging "elogind-updates" branch
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
75805: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75805
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
This updates elogind to 255.17, the latest version. It's already been
built for x86_64 on the CI, without issues apparently:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/2020498
--
Thanks,
Maxim
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:
> I see one failure in the elogind-updates branch that is probably related
> to the changes:
>
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/elogind-updates/package-changes?armhf-linux-change=broken&armhf-linux-change=still-failing&armhf-linux-change=unknown-to-failing&armhf-linux-change=new-failing
>
> sssd fails across all architectures.
>
> From my point of view, if the node-team branch is ready to be merged
> (one outstanding failure, libnode on 32 bits), it could go ahead;
> with a bit of luck, these two branches are essentially independent,
> so rebasing elogind-updates after the node-teams merge would not cause
> too many rebuilds.
I've gone ahead and pushed the elogind-updates changes to master
now. I've reconfigured my laptop with the changes, and things seem to
work.
Unfortunately this breaks sssd, maybe this could have been avoided by
not bumping samba/pinned, but unfortunately I don't know why that change
was made on this branch, and at this point it would probably cause lots
of rebuilds.
I added a deprecated alias for inkscape/stable, since just removing that
could break any channel making use of that export.
I also removed the "upstream: Do not update to same version." commit
from the pushed changes since I fail to see the relation to elogind, and
it seems like this doesn't need to go via a branch. I couldn't see what
patch series included it, so I've submitted it as #77741.
Thanks for all your work preparing these changes Maxim!
Chris
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 43 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.