GNU bug report logs - #75762
[shepherd] Confusion about relative file names

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net>
Subject: bug#75762: closed (Re: bug#75762: [shepherd] Confusion about
 relative file names)
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 11:27:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#75762: [shepherd] Confusion about relative file names

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 75762 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
75762: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75762
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 75762-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#75762: [shepherd] Confusion about relative file names
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:26:08 +0100

Hi,

Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net> skribis:

>> The situation actually depends on the action you’re running.
>> Starting from 1a8d686b7fa617d9b1df33858957a240b7e11787, shepherd no
>> longer changes directory to the client’s directory.  So now it’s up to
>> its action to interpret file names as it wants.  We should update the
>> manual accordingly.
>> Did you have a specific action in mind though?
>> 
> I was prototyping a user daemon via 'herd load root' before I was
> ready to commit it to my home-environment and was a bit surprised that
> I had to use the full path resp. a path relative to $HOME. This would
> be consistent with the info in section 3.2 but not what I would
> expect.

Right.  I pushed a clarification as
882e56ce168c2ddb014cf35e2767d78778e0ba64.

Thanks!

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [shepherd] Confusion about relative file names
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:30:40 +0000

Hello,

Was reading through the shepherd manual and it seems to contain 
contradictory information regarding relative file names:

In Chapter 3 ('herd' and 'shepherd') the manual reads

> Since herd passes its current working directory to ‘shepherd’, you can pass relative file names without trouble.

Chapter 3.2 (Invoking 'herd')

> If you pass a file name as an ARG, it will be passed as-is to the Shepherd, thus if it is not an absolute name, it is local to the current working directory of ‘shepherd’, not to herd.

So which one is it or is there something I am missing here?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.