GNU bug report logs - #75755
feature/igc: Missing IGC_CHECK_RES?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #71 received at 75755 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: pipcet <at> protonmail.com, eller.helmut <at> gmail.com, gerd <at> gnu.org,
 gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, 75755 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, acorallo <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#75755: feature/igc: Missing IGC_CHECK_RES?
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 09:29:54 +0200
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:32:16 -0600
> Cc: pipcet <at> protonmail.com, gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, 75755 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
> 	gerd <at> gnu.org, eller.helmut <at> gmail.com, acorallo <at> gnu.org
> 
> >> Please let me know what you think of my most recent patch.  If you want
> >> something different, may I ask that you send a patch?  I don't think
> >> I understand if your idea is different from what I posted.  Thanks.
> >
> > Your patch still uses _mps_RES_ENUM, which is a macro that's not
> > supposed to be used outside of MPS.  Isn't that so?  I thought all
> > this discussion was how to avoid using that macro, wasn't it?
> 
> AFAIU, the patch I proposed removes that macro.  I just now grepped for
> _mps_RES_ENUM after applying it, and couldn't find any matches in my
> tree.  Are you seeing something different?

Yes, I was looking at a stale igc.c, so I didn't see that
mps_res_to_string was modified exactly as I suggested to do.

Sorry.




This bug report was last modified 163 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.