Subject: bug#75755: feature/igc: Missing IGC_CHECK_RES?

From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:53:07 -0600

Pip Cet <[email-masked]> writes:

> Fixed.  Thanks again.

Thanks.

Gerd Möllmann <[email-masked]> writes:

> Pip Cet <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> "Pip Cet" <[email-masked]> writes:
>>
>> My preference would be to add this code before result_string:
>>
>> /* Define a named enumeration containing all cases that the integer type
>>    mps_res_t is known to cover.  */
>>
>> enum mps_res_enum
>> {
>>   _mps_RES_ENUM (RES_CASE, MPS_RES_)
>> };
>> #undef RES_CASE
>
> That would be nice, indeed.

Can we rely on this or is it an internal API?