GNU bug report logs - #75613
tail-c test fails on CentOS 6

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#75613: closed (tail-c test fails on CentOS 6)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:20:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:14 +0000
with message-id <f85a491c-891d-4eeb-968a-4a85f30ae09f <at> draigBrady.com>
and subject line Re: bug#75613: tail-c test fails on CentOS 6
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #75613,
regarding tail-c test fails on CentOS 6
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
75613: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75613
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: tail-c test fails on CentOS 6
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:50:29 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

On CentOS 6, there is a test failure:

FAIL: tests/tail/tail-c.sh

Log is attached. The command that fails is:

  timeout --verbose 1 tail -c 4096 /dev/urandom

And indeed, I can reproduce it manually:

  $ timeout --verbose 1 src/tail -c 4096 /dev/urandom
  timeout: Unrecognized option '--verbose'
  Try `timeout --help' for more information.

  $ src/timeout --verbose 1 src/tail -c 4096 /dev/urandom
  timeout: sending signal TERM to command 'src/tail'
  $ echo $?
  124

[test-suite.log (text/x-log, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
Cc: 75613-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#75613: tail-c test fails on CentOS 6
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:19:14 +0000

On 16/01/2025 21:16, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2025-01-16 13:11, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> I propose we at least adjust the test
>> to skip failures on older kernels, as in the attached.
> 
> Thanks, that looks good to me too.

Pushed.

Marking this as done.

cheers,
Pádraig

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.