GNU bug report logs - #75521
scratch/igc: Delete unused macro DEFVAR_LISP_NOPROX

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:56:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #118 received at 75521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 75521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#75521: scratch/igc: Delete unused macro DEFVAR_LISP_NOPROX
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:16:21 +0200
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 10:56:55 +0000
> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
> Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>, 75521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> I'll stop here.  Yet another simple improvement (and bug fix) to Emacs
> which was effectively vetoed.

I have nothing useful to respond to these accusations, except to
reiterate my firm belief that we should prefer investing our energy
and resources in adding new infrastructure and/or replacing old one
with newer and better one, to investing them in cleaning up old
infrastructure.  The old infrastructure works and works well; it had
worked for us for decades.  Cleaning it up brings only very small
gains, if at all, while running non-negligible risks of introducing
bugs.

So replacing the current GC with a better, more performant and
sophisticated one, is okay and very welcome; cleaning up the old GC is
much less so (especially when we already have plans for replacing it).

Let's be wise in where we decide to invest our resources.




This bug report was last modified 123 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.