Subject: bug#75521: scratch/igc: Delete unused macro DEFVAR_LISP_NOPROX

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 22:11:00 +0200

> From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 20:01:24 +0000
> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> >> I'm curious why this was considered worth optimizing in the first place.
> >
> > What is the optimization here? DEFVAR_LISP_NOPRO or font_style_table?
> 
> I was thinking of DEFVAR_LISP_NOPRO:

AFAIU, it's there to avoid protecting something that is already
protected.  staticvec[] is a static vector, so wasting slots there is
best avoided.