GNU bug report logs - #75518
Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:33:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Z572 <z572 <at> z572.online>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>, Z572 <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>, Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>, Rutherther <rutherther <at> ditigal.xyz>, Iyzsong <iyzsong <at> envs.net>, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>, yelninei <at> tutamail.com, 75518 <75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#75518] Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:46:58 +0200
Hello,

Am Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 05:38:25PM +0800 schrieb Z572:
> for now, these packages are blocking the bulid.
> (...)

thanks for the analysis!

> Now a lot of packages are stuck at qtlocation <at> 5, but I think it doesn 't
> make sense to just fix it. It needs to be upgraded later, The new
> version of qt5 seems to fix some compilation issues for new version gcc,
> so I think it' s possible to upgrade qt5 on core-packages-team. What do
> you think?

Definitely everything that does not build now can be repaired/updated,
since we lose no work. You could have a look at the (dormant and waiting
for core-packages-team) qt-team branch if the problem is already solved
there. If possible, it would be nice to be "conservative" and to change
as little as possible so as to avoid adding breakage somewhere.

Andreas





This bug report was last modified 22 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.