GNU bug report logs - #75518
Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:33:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Full log


Message #190 received at 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Rutherther <rutherther <at> ditigal.xyz>
Cc: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>,
 Z572 <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>,
 Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>, iyzsong <at> envs.net,
 Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, Z572 <z572 <at> z572.online>, 75518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 yelninei <at> tutamail.com, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Request for merging "core-packages-team" branch
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 23:28:03 +0200
Hello,

Rutherther <rutherther <at> ditigal.xyz> writes:

> FYI graft of bash has been added a part of series that adds support for
> /etc/profile.d and /etc/bashrc.d,
> the graft makes bash source /etc/bashrc on its own,
> it had to be sourced manually from ~/.profile previously.

Uh.  I think we should avoid keep grafts for security updates that need
to happen quickly.

> Btw how do rebases work currently? As far as I know the mirror bot
> cannot remove branches so it won't sync the branches to savannah, but QA
> takes the branches from savannah. Or am I mistaken somewhere?

I’m not sure if the “mirror bot” (actually Forgejo) can remove branches
or not.  But I believe that if we rebase and force-push, Savannah should
follow.  So I would assume that this work and if it doesn’t, we’ll see
how to fix it.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 22 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.