GNU bug report logs - #75512
Typo in (elisp) Symbol Components documentation

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Matt <matt <at> excalamus.com>

Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:29:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #12 received at 75512-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Matt <matt <at> excalamus.com>, 75512-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#75512: Typo in (elisp) Symbol Components documentation
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 04:10:13 +0100
Version: 30.1

Matt <matt <at> excalamus.com> writes:

> Incorrect plural on word "variable":
>
> modified   doc/lispref/symbols.texi
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ reference any object.  (This is not the same thing as holding the symbol
>  a value cell that is void results in an error, such as @samp{Symbol's
>  value as variable is void}.
>
> -  Because each symbol has separate value and function cells, variables
> +  Because each symbol has separate value and function cells, variable
>  names and function names do not conflict.  For example, the symbol
>  @code{buffer-file-name} has a value (the name of the file being
>  visited in the current buffer) as well as a function definition (a
>
> It may also help comprehension to remove the word "names" as follows:
>
> modified   doc/lispref/symbols.texi
> @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ reference any object.  (This is not the same thing as holding the symbol
>  a value cell that is void results in an error, such as @samp{Symbol's
>  value as variable is void}.
>
> -  Because each symbol has separate value and function cells, variables
> -names and function names do not conflict.  For example, the symbol
> +  Because each symbol has separate value and function cells, variable
> +and function names do not conflict.  For example, the symbol
>  @code{buffer-file-name} has a value (the name of the file being
>  visited in the current buffer) as well as a function definition (a
>  primitive function that returns the name of the file):
>
> Removing "names" makes the form of the statement match the form of the preceding phrase.  The phrase has form "A and B X", the statement has form "A X and B X".

Thanks!  I fixed it like this instead:

    Because each symbol has separate value and function cells, the names
    of variables and functions do not conflict.

Closing this bug.




This bug report was last modified 167 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.