GNU bug report logs - #75462
libtool wrongly reorder compiler deps on linux

Previous Next

Package: libtool;

Reported by: Frederic Berat <fberat <at> redhat.com>

Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:14:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95 <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Frederic Berat <fberat <at> redhat.com>
Subject: bug#75462: closed (Re: bug#75462: libtool wrongly reorder
 compiler deps on linux)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:57:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#75462: libtool wrongly reorder compiler deps on linux

which was filed against the libtool package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 75462 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
75462: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75462
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95 <at> gmail.com>
To: 75462-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Frederic Berat <fberat <at> redhat.com>
Subject: Re: bug#75462: libtool wrongly reorder compiler deps on linux
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:56:35 +0200
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Thank you again for the patch [1].

[1] 
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/commit/?h=development&id=18dc06ade3db7c4100e781d1c1ef8c5b018ca920

-- 
Ileana Dumitrescu

GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354

[OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Frederic Berat <fberat <at> redhat.com>
To: bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
Subject: libtool wrongly reorder compiler deps on linux
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:11:36 +0100
[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

I opened an issue a few years back that didn't get solved:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2022-02/msg00001.html

Out of curiosity, I decided to remove my local patch for it with the new
libtool release. It didn't take long for builds to fail again:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331361

Considering that more and more systems prevent deduplication over the
years, may it be considered to be the default behavior instead of the
exception ?

Frédéric Bérat

Principal Software Engineer, Platform Tools

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>

fberat <at> redhat.com
<https://www.redhat.com>
[Message part 8 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 123 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.