Subject: Re: bug#7545: 24.0.50; (elisp) `Simple Types'

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:50:47 +0200

"Drew Adams" <[email-masked]> writes:

> Why are types `alist' and `plist' considered simple types?  Seems like
> they are like `cons', `repeat', and `list', not like `string' and
> `symbol'.  They are structures with component types.  Don't they belong
> in node `Composite Types'?

That seems logical.  But this report was marked as "notabug", but
doesn't show how it got that mark.  Anybody know what that means?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/