GNU bug report logs -
#75413
Fix faulty example of SRFI-31 in the manual.
Previous Next
Full log
Message #14 received at 75413 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Sorry about the flood. I have added `(newline)`, but the example
output did not have the literal newlines, so in this patch I have
added both the `(newline)` call and the example output newlines.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 6:01 AM Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Adding a `(newline)` in this patch.
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 3:23 AM Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > > index d77bc1c90..1373409f0 100644
> > > --- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > > +++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > > @@ -3367,8 +3367,9 @@ The second syntax can be used to create anonymous recursive functions:
> > >
> > > @lisp
> > > guile> (define tmp (rec (display-n item n)
> > > - (if (positive? n)
> > > - (begin (display n) (display-n (- n 1))))))
> > > + (when (positive? n)
> > > + (display item)
> > > + (display-n item (- n 1)))))
> > > guile> (tmp 42 3)
> > > 424242
> > > guile>
> >
> > Looks good overall -- strictly speaking, might need a (newline) in there
> > if we want the output to match (or the output could be changed).
> >
> > --
> > Rob Browning
> > rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
> > GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
> > GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
[0001-Fix-faulty-SRFI-31-example.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 182 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.