GNU bug report logs - #75413
Fix faulty example of SRFI-31 in the manual.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 75413 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>
To: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>
Cc: 75413 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#75413: Fix faulty example of SRFI-31 in the manual.
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 06:01:54 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Adding a `(newline)` in this patch.

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 3:23 AM Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org> wrote:
>
> Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > index d77bc1c90..1373409f0 100644
> > --- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > +++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
> > @@ -3367,8 +3367,9 @@ The second syntax can be used to create anonymous recursive functions:
> >
> >  @lisp
> >    guile> (define tmp (rec (display-n item n)
> > -                       (if (positive? n)
> > -                           (begin (display n) (display-n (- n 1))))))
> > +                       (when (positive? n)
> > +                           (display item)
> > +                           (display-n item (- n 1)))))
> >    guile> (tmp 42 3)
> >    424242
> >    guile>
>
> Looks good overall -- strictly speaking, might need a (newline) in there
> if we want the output to match (or the output could be changed).
>
> --
> Rob Browning
> rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
> GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
> GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

[0001-Fix-faulty-SRFI-31-example.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.