Subject: Re: [bug#75384] [PATCH 0/4] Bump node-lts to 22.12.0

From: Jelle Licht <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:15:25 +0100

"Thompson, David" <[email-masked]> writes:

> Hey Jelle,

[snip]

> Now, there's a practical issue for getting this merged.  `guix refresh
> -l node` tells me this:
>
> Building the following 162 packages would ensure 280 dependent
> packages are rebuilt: [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] hydrus-network@495 [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> openfoam-com@2212 [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
> [email-masked] [email-masked]
>
> This would be quite a disruptive change to push to the master branch.
> Is there anyone who can help get these patches pre-baked in CI before
> merging?  That would be much appreciated!

Agreed! Ludo, does your offer to pre-bake the substitutes for the Node
version bump still stand?
Thanks!
- Jelle