Subject: Re: [bug#75384] [PATCH 0/4] Bump node-lts to 22.12.0

From: "Thompson, David" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:36:11 -0500

Hey Jelle,

On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 12:49 PM <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> From: Jelle Licht <[email-masked]>
>
> Hi all, this series bumps node-lts to version 22.12.0.

I tested the patch series and everything compiled successfully.  I
also tested it with WebAssembly binaries generated by Hoot, to see if
we could drop our custom, non-bootstrapped Node build in that project,
and indeed we can!

The code all looks good to me!  Thank you for doing this important
work!  I must admit I briefly looked into upgrading Node back when the
22 series was fresh and couldn't figure it out.

Now, there's a practical issue for getting this merged.  `guix refresh
-l node` tells me this:

Building the following 162 packages would ensure 280 dependent
packages are rebuilt: [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] hydrus-network@495 [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
openfoam-com@2212 [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked] [email-masked]
[email-masked] [email-masked]

This would be quite a disruptive change to push to the master branch.
Is there anyone who can help get these patches pre-baked in CI before
merging?  That would be much appreciated!

- Dave