GNU bug report logs - #7533
24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:32:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #47 received at 7533 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'martin rudalics'" <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 'Chong Yidong' <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>, 7533 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#7533: 24.0.50;
	`dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames'
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:55:40 -0800
>  > Apparently you think that the proper fix of removing the 
>  > frame is too hard to implement for some reason.  In that
>  > case I request that we return to the sane behavior of Emacs 22.
> 
> You can get the "sane" behavior if you don't include such buffers in
> `special-display-regexps'.
> 
>  > emacs -Q in Emacs 22 does exactly what I described: it 
>  > pops up a window, not a frame, and it removes the window
>  > when the user dialog is finished.
> 
> emacs -Q in Emacs 23 does the same.

Not at all.  The context you omitted makes it clear that (a) you are reaching
for straws by bringing in `dired-shrink-to-fit' and (b) Emacs 22 does not suffer
the bug: it removes the temporary display when done.

You are showing nothing but bad faith.  Why did you even make the partial fix,
wrt `pop-up-frames'?  Why don't you just tell users they can get the "sane"
behavior by setting `pop-up-frames' to nil?  This is a sorry state indeed.





This bug report was last modified 12 years and 311 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.