GNU bug report logs -
#75275
30.0.92; `make-thread` bug on macOS 15.2
Previous Next
Full log
Message #125 received at 75275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 07:22:21PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
> > Cc: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>, stefankangas <at> gmail.com,
> > 75275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 18:09:46 +0100
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > >> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:06:25 +0000
> > >> From: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>
> > >> Cc: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>,
> > >> 75275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 09:19:36AM -0600, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> > >> > That patch fixes it for me, indeed. Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> Hi Stefan, any chance you could check this version?
> > >>
> > >> I have a suspicion that Gerd's will break C-g again.
> > >
> > > Did C-g work before Gerd's commit back in March? If not, this is not
> > > a regression. If it did work, can you explain how the change Gerd
> > > proposed now will break C-g?
> >
> > It's different. I made the change because Emacs freezed and C-g did
> > nothing. With my change, Emacs freezed and I could get out with C-g, at
> > least sometimes.
>
> Your change included 2 hunks, and the suggestion is to revert only
> one of them. My question is whether this is likely to reintroduce
> some regression.
Perhaps I'm wrong. Gerd, can you remember, did your change for C-g
require ns_select to run the NS runloop, or did it just require the
clearing out of the input queue? I'm just concerned because this
change will reintroduce situations where it won't run the runloop.
The more I think about it the more I think I'm wrong...
--
Alan Third
This bug report was last modified 163 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.