GNU bug report logs - #75270
[PATCH 0/3] services: greetd: Improve greeter configurations.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#75270: closed ([PATCH 0/3] services: greetd: Improve greeter
 configurations.)
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:54:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 17:53:21 +0900
with message-id <87h6565e66.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] services: greetd: Improve greeter configurations.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #75270,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] services: greetd: Improve greeter configurations.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
75270: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75270
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: muradm <mail <at> muradm.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] services: greetd: Improve greeter configurations.
Date: Thu,  2 Jan 2025 01:47:50 +0300

Improves greeter configuration and adds new gtkgreet greeter.

muradm (3):
  services: greetd: Improve greeter configurations.
  gnu: Add gtkgreet.
  services: greetd: Add new gtkgreet greeter.

 doc/guix.texi          | 153 +++++++++++++++------
 gnu/packages/admin.scm |  25 +++-
 gnu/services/base.scm  | 295 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 gnu/tests/desktop.scm  |  14 +-
 4 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)


base-commit: 151865ada4afb70b57e5f44248fce5bda9080af5
-- 
2.47.1

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: muradm <mail <at> muradm.net>
Cc: 75270-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] services: greetd: Improve greeter configurations.
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 17:53:21 +0900

Hi,

muradm <mail <at> muradm.net> writes:

> I explicitly named field 'extra-shepherd-requirement' due to its 
> implementation. Other places you mention about configure whole 
> list of requirements, for instance:

[...]

Nevermind my previous message, I've reinstated the
extra-shepherd-requirement naming.  Thanks for your explanation.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.