GNU bug report logs -
#75205
guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test)
Previous Next
Reported by: Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:56:01 UTC
Severity: important
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #8 received at 75205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This is failing for me on aarch64-linux also:
test-name: kexec-load-file
location:
/tmp/guix-build-guix-1.4.0-31.121e96d.drv-0/source/tests/syscalls.scm:688
source:
+ (test-equal
+ "kexec-load-file"
+ EPERM
+ (catch 'system-error
+ (lambda ()
+ (let ((fd1 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY))
+ (fd2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY)))
+ (kexec-load-file fd1 fd2 "gnu.repl=yes")))
+ (lambda args (system-error-errno args))))
expected-value: 1
actual-value: 38
result: FAIL
If I downgrade to commit 96cd163c14e68c66c6a4cf0b18261fc454f8c1ba,
guix tests pass again -- the failing test was added in the next
commit. I’m not sure what the issue here, it seems like that
syscall shouldn’t be arch-dependent, and the errnos in the
failures are unhelpful. 38 is ERANGE, 14 is EFAULT, neither of
those seem applicable here. EPERM is 1, and 38 doesn’t have its
LSB set, so it can’t be a bitmask.
I’m encountering the issue using Guix as a foreign package manager
on top of Debian 12 "bookworm" in a VM. Perhaps there’s an
implicit dependency on the host system’s kernel in the test, which
Debian’s fails to meet.
Ludo’, any thoughts?
-- Ian
This bug report was last modified 141 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.