From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 30 11:55:34 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2024 16:55:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tSJ3G-0003r6-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:34 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42464) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tSJ3E-0003qy-GH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSJ3D-0005o0-Io for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:32 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSJ3B-0001wR-T6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:55:31 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41EB5240027 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:55:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1735577726; bh=FDFv+lcHRtqv/35nRYGQ4z+y/79G1WOrPHZ/ZMYWUlU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:From:Subject:To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=PpNlZpkGnO4Vy5qoje0wKUfbTy1Y7P9JwogcQXS3QddnjTz1sApRwIDwDNGI04TtO NAUN4ddTOH/JvMAzPf0dcLMlOs3WIEAW8H4JmDlf2xGZhx16nzhXbZzfCmaWuSQv5B ijtse1Y+OQs5IA9s+ZecnXObCLaN92PweprGAXvpb0zQBsyPEE/+nNKy3x+hsmlAyG Y1K2EcgbaEYmRswAomuq9wl0he0f3ACfk/j4xeZVq3sJMerpqSM7Z6GasrGMQStpXF gkYabcTwWQcVzyOoW9Ap8HnjiT4HlcOGF+w0qpUC9arC9MREiQy+QSfqrfSmDT6psB iEGNSYdlFN8EA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YMMfj2QJXz9rxF for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:55:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <781419f2-6304-4c18-b01c-412121126ee5@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:55:17 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dariqq Subject: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test) Content-Language: en-US To: bug-guix@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=dariqq@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, The guix package is failing the newly added kexec-load-file syscall test on i686-linux: From https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/7774049/details: test-name: kexec-load-file location: /tmp/guix-build-guix-1.4.0-31.121e96d.drv-0/source/tests/syscalls.scm:688 source: + (test-equal + "kexec-load-file" + EPERM + (catch 'system-error + (lambda () + (let ((fd1 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY)) + (fd2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY))) + (kexec-load-file fd1 fd2 "gnu.repl=yes"))) + (lambda args (system-error-errno args)))) expected-value: 1 actual-value: 14 result: FAIL From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 31 23:17:21 2024 Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2025 04:17:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tSqAa-000414-MP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:20 -0500 Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.154]:53603) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tSqAY-00040q-1A for 75205@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:18 -0500 Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8451140157; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=retrospec.tv; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1735705032; x=1735791432; bh=uN +nPcllXViu4nmWIVu3ouLoVvKIgos0hhBtB1locQk=; b=2K9CWQzpue+MRYAP81 kAV1JV1RChHC1m9AwIR9aPpuwv659iQEezzYppU58L6MmMHyCnUb/BySxR0sq0Q/ /G9hKLhS6qsW0sV1J21sP8Uz6Q+CL4aHs0aug7DRzmf5Yhzmfh+7QesuQgQcepRU pXbCWaWvgcW9+c+iitajKSoLCc9HwL7W2YCBrYJb5tFkPu/qxMzgnXA/p3qh3g4G J/NmIa0/9qTu+NLA5MP8R18X3p0CEk2Lpfdkey3wG0XpKtVdytFHfA8Ob+R46a+G 7JikF35B3GHagL7s+I6jk2TFBx72gK4P4rV17+eGFaSZodEoJYbUWasLBTzHJ5n/ AdAQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1735705032; x=1735791432; bh=uN+nPcllXViu4nmWIVu3ouLoVvKI gos0hhBtB1locQk=; b=wDy0vaaZ8cz19RLvAfk/Ae9LK+67nGqo8wl644RwSns7 ywhHf7fC2uF9WhRZB7O5+GIUJFHOIRf2IMrixYsv7DS7+FsfVtk1xoVnClOsOTw7 /O+RMH6XUmM7AhugAnDm0JlcFG6CVwZvzVtH+0JhYD3nQNFd+UykMUS6UCJ+BmPm guiiDn1OhMWDPyx3lmKSOBEfGFFlP78xZe+4mZkVJHkBwcQBvX/H9rkd4ETa3tdU BOF8VntztvXe/87Cdmb31gBRyAXihzn5+fQnOs2WN5ZvM9AWWKgf7/YzJSFnWdzC jUPNUvJwBrJiitGINnw5b2TzMaLcvfCs7CSd1MgItQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddruddvledgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefufgffkfggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecu hfhrohhmpefkrghnucfguhhrvgcuoehirghnsehrvghtrhhoshhpvggtrdhtvheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdetkeffffefiefhueekvdeiueegieegffdthfelveelgfdtvdfh tdduheffuedvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepihgrnhesrhgvthhrohhsphgvtgdrthhvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhmohgu vgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehluhguohesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtth hopeejhedvtdehseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: id9014242:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 23:17:12 -0500 (EST) From: Ian Eure To: 75205@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test) User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 20:17:09 -0800 Message-ID: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@retrospec.tv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) This is failing for me on aarch64-linux also: test-name: kexec-load-file location:=20 /tmp/guix-build-guix-1.4.0-31.121e96d.drv-0/source/tests/syscalls.scm:6= 88 source: + (test-equal + "kexec-load-file" + EPERM + (catch 'system-error + (lambda () + (let ((fd1 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY)) + (fd2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY))) + (kexec-load-file fd1 fd2 "gnu.repl=3Dyes"))) + (lambda args (system-error-errno args)))) expected-value: 1 actual-value: 38 result: FAIL If I downgrade to commit 96cd163c14e68c66c6a4cf0b18261fc454f8c1ba,=20 guix tests pass again -- the failing test was added in the next=20 commit. I=E2=80=99m not sure what the issue here, it seems like that=20 syscall shouldn=E2=80=99t be arch-dependent, and the errnos in the=20 failures are unhelpful. 38 is ERANGE, 14 is EFAULT, neither of=20 those seem applicable here. EPERM is 1, and 38 doesn=E2=80=99t have its=20 LSB set, so it can=E2=80=99t be a bitmask. I=E2=80=99m encountering the issue using Guix as a foreign package manager= =20 on top of Debian 12 "bookworm" in a VM. Perhaps there=E2=80=99s an=20 implicit dependency on the host system=E2=80=99s kernel in the test, which= =20 Debian=E2=80=99s fails to meet. Ludo=E2=80=99, any thoughts? -- Ian From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 04 13:11:57 2025 Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2025 18:11:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tU8cu-0005No-SG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 13:11:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39502) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tU8cr-0005NW-QC for 75205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 13:11:54 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU8cm-0007Wx-5U; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 13:11:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=sik+X1aJNkWQAG+oJGwfePlo1wlAzE4gcSTmNBnCmhk=; b=os8GK0s/i9hYIsWnZifT G5tsiKGzKnj5FqxTPePFZNStJHpzQ7WlQ55L+Yo5Jh0Y29DLmUutYzyP6iYT1JjS2xVhDCO+eVri+ GQQezYULZfyp/1N1EDqfl9+s7GIgytGeCozWoHJOUNXhgX/e+EbxfHBREG03zPCyYWTIGV7UVRUu7 FrSci0aTAkTWcxCTZJSHPOLdmMXO7c3c2cHvmRLeFqhQ1w8kOjEKxUj1wUXm7kGr18c658iMHF/Wl maNUjkFUEvZ0wn0q4tt0iEIpgrt6zqBmsPstFHK3myfsRiVxHBf3fIeX9XvDPk72xYcMNuZU2of1P 00kR9+80erJSug==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ian Eure Subject: Re: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test) In-Reply-To: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@retrospec.tv> (Ian Eure's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2024 20:17:09 -0800") References: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@retrospec.tv> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 15 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Lapin X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 19:11:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87v7uuphyg.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205 Cc: 75205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Ian Eure skribis: > This is failing for me on aarch64-linux also: > > test-name: kexec-load-file > location: > /tmp/guix-build-guix-1.4.0-31.121e96d.drv-0/source/tests/syscalls.scm:= 688 > source: > + (test-equal > + "kexec-load-file" > + EPERM > + (catch 'system-error > + (lambda () > + (let ((fd1 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY)) > + (fd2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY))) > + (kexec-load-file fd1 fd2 "gnu.repl=3Dyes"))) > + (lambda args (system-error-errno args)))) > expected-value: 1 > actual-value: 38 > result: FAIL Could you strace it, to see if strace decodes it are =E2=80=98kexec_file_lo= ad=E2=80=99? For example like this: ./pre-inst-env strace -e kexec_file_load \ guile -c '(use-modules (guix build syscalls)) (kexec-load-file (open-fd= es "/dev/null" O_RDONLY) (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_RDONLY) "")' 38 is ENOSYS (=E2=80=9CFunction not implemented=E2=80=9D), not ERANGE. Thi= s could mean that kexec support is missing in this kernel. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 04:08:34 2025 Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2025 09:08:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUj69-0007ja-PW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 04:08:34 -0500 Received: from mail.venatores.group ([2001:19f0:9002:2d20:5400:4ff:fe1f:ec4b]:60008) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUTWu-0004IB-Jq for 75205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 11:31:09 -0500 From: boogs DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=venatores.group; s=mail; t=1736094662; bh=N0VEWDGQy3w+MGz/jUCqAAvtaAiwF6jknF+xmMos8Oc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Vu1ZH7rAkvXfqp/JsonZJsUDnyXXQjmOK3x6ygV8ArI1c+iGNSnia86R6ACKlYdda FTI3DwuVH5VQ52LpEhi3KQ8kuOvVAyQ4o5TbGEgByN2oJ2o0bYSo+Lx+yEWlUqK3J3 ub99LISiac8ihseJxanVW77G9jrcyD2/8WkAEs6uOJ+91TAfZIV2QpvQLuCrESwQ2G qwekbGU4CqMuvJon/FdozcWiHHGLMC8TIzNf0CHmQFxWPKYAxR9dOchUoaHVQDLH2S H7BwqlhTTbNfZxXActa5pF26xYzpYFpX6lZCtzYrDmoB1ojLLyYtC15Q5ZNrnudYuz Ekemw5kcnNLlg== To: 75205@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test) Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 11:31:02 -0500 Message-ID: <87pll1kyt5.fsf@venatores.group> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 04:08:32 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Forwarding my reply from this other relevant thread[1]: > Hi, > It looks like some people[1,2] including myself are running into an issue where the `guix system reconfigure` command fails, presumably because `KEXEC_FILE_DEBUG` is not supported in older kernel configurations. > > The output of reconfiguring my system is the same as Simen's[2] ending in: > > ``` > To complete the upgrade, run 'herd restart SERVICE' to stop, > upgrade, and restart each service that was not automatically restarted. > Run 'herd status' to view the list of services on your system. > WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete' > guix system: error: kexec-load-file: Invalid argument > ``` > > My system runs a custom kernel configuration that I created via `make menuconfig` in the kernel repo. I suspect the issue lies here: > > ``` > (define (kexec-loading-program os) > "Return a program that calls 'kexec_file_load' to allow rebooting into OS > via 'kexec'." > (let ((root-device (file-system-device > (operating-system-root-file-system os)))) > (program-file > "kexec-load-system.scm" > (with-imported-modules '((guix build syscalls)) > #~(begin > (use-modules (guix build syscalls)) > (let ((kernel (open-fdes #$(operating-system-kernel-file os) > O_RDONLY)) > (initrd (open-fdes #$(operating-system-initrd-file os) > O_RDONLY))) > (kexec-load-file kernel initrd > (string-join > (list #$@(operating-system-kernel-arguments > os root-device))) > KEXEC_FILE_DEBUG))))))) > ``` > > This is the relevant snippet from my kernel configuration: > > ``` > # > # Kexec and crash features > # > CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y > CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP=y > CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y > CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG=y > CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES=8192 > # end of Kexec and crash features > # end of General setup > ``` > > [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75320 > [2] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75211 [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75027 -- Boogs From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 05:50:08 2025 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2025 10:50:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUkgO-0004HA-P2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 05:50:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUkgN-0004FO-6Z for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 05:50:03 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUkgH-00044I-Tq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 05:49:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:Subject:From:To:Date:in-reply-to: references; bh=niP69ou6D2l+hZHh+CZ9PwLU4UhzVdy9KeJgHbguE+s=; b=LkmgG8QO1+jVoG kFOLInPr3qwNKNykejSBxcRV5bEnQ6GgT54I/fhZyLx7jMPHynOfdgyvgJOLd0QLuFGY/wk4hx6P4 gFXb7cT5zkziaDR3wFCA7KUgaTFotycCWhNtCctGwl+4PS7w0ntGteKzSJYuxXdfHWH8R8i/cHKXC Bi5aar086Bs3jCvte230KJUFxhl0R8TTLxBV3o7eLaONVV0x3hYvxm43Wtjh/xUpmfAMsCClN8fY1 j9GJnwquAeTMuYjkQizWaCwlD/H2WHztieFJ9qkeA/h8K/a8yjnrNFLjvYpi354HqfRXG5OFizaiK Pbl7fQ1I4yJWAGsk3UKA==; Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 11:49:56 +0100 Message-Id: <87ikqs9pyj.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #75205 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) severity 75205 important quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 08:20:55 2025 Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2025 13:20:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUn2N-0003ki-1d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:20:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUn2K-0003kT-Qt for 75205@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:20:53 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUn2F-0006Z4-2m; Mon, 06 Jan 2025 08:20:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=hW0AhbgTSOs7z4u6cP9LTk4CZQzFOOFy/3YlnHcGa3U=; b=gRbYj0zwIj8y2D46aIr4 kUJrIkTt0jz421zDuyowwhxi8WcOX7WC4aqyEdsMAa/BWMcc4+Sq0YL2PkS0mpKYihQw6T3Hz1bAX 31lgjt0wvOu1XRHr7nQhuExwX8C5EQBqQ48mUZA/Wj/jVp7D3eHlf51ZZ4hCQ623i/d2Wkrp+YrAd ERstBbxd3q6+gUibpYM+E5xg5p09G6KpzSVHTXl8NtjPyQrMjW0LiMmyCxBgl2PP3iFS95Y+AAu+M 2nuSDu1pDBmFB/WJfdSgMdp+nz40DraZMREz2xYERCHEBXzbr709IutO+JCx/UIGE+uZAhlOV7LH2 hNaoivJMq9a65Q==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ian Eure Subject: Re: bug#75205: guix package test failure on i686-linux (kexec-load-file test) In-Reply-To: <87v7uuphyg.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sat, 04 Jan 2025 19:11:35 +0100") References: <87seq3uq0q.fsf@retrospec.tv> <87v7uuphyg.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 14:20:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87wmf884et.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205 Cc: 75205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) See . From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 11 03:26:11 2025 Received: (at 75205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2025 08:26:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1thlat-00010B-0v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:26:11 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:34659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1thlap-0000zZ-AF for 75205@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:26:09 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5042240101 for <75205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:25:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1739262359; bh=NR8zBhFUWgDDTXtMzvQniszi71lmKHlI8xC2xOUQrFI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=gE6n0NtIGr+HHT1OV44Dvw6gioRxKKeJBZmNK4jjX0cqaCkojl6hI2c2V2EtORQJv AAvTBtjTaIzITo0p+4/WRNR1UlpoQ5ujKqqYC1WKe+ZCE8v490IURClKJbt9n3ZArV 3BC5C9kczKMcWJjrwQSH7ZcPUch5yMZnnai2UvKfE5ZDt3DzA3pyPXcclplvrBAyCO c4JjL+MRBy7rWOwuhDUVi0x0YP8u+rqIYW26eplDtjR8Rr8qz7WdWd4E0EVwr3/rgv iIMLCWQJHfMActJWlelcsgiIKtA5gSer6Zyco6E1pdjUdO/D2ir33vSdN+j9toPeoA mMLTEPIc3pwHg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YsZK14dB2z9rxb; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:25:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <9125798d-4d27-4d83-9f82-774dfef9fda3@posteo.net> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:25:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5BPATCH_2/3=5D_syscalls=3A_Remove_wrong_syscall_ID?= =?UTF-8?B?IGZvciDigJhrZXhlY19sb2FkX2ZpbGXigJkgb24gaTY4Ni4=?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , 75205@debbugs.gnu.org References: <6062eaed018a8c738577dbb699d7e0324a4f8746.1736168031.git.ludo@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Dariqq In-Reply-To: <6062eaed018a8c738577dbb699d7e0324a4f8746.1736168031.git.ludo@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Ludo, Can #75205 be closed now? With the update to guix in d7157cca1053d82041e4fc294f9a5f13e2cf612b the package builds again for i686: I built it myself and also ci.g.g.o was successful (taking 7000 seconds!): https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/9193966/details Thanks for the fix. On 06.01.25 13:58, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Fixes . > > * guix/build/syscalls.scm (kexec-load-file): Remove syscall ID for i686. > * tests/syscalls.scm ("kexec-load-file"): Accept ENOSYS in addition to > EPERM. > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 21 04:51:53 2025 Received: (at 75205-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2025 09:51:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tlPhI-0000mG-UV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:51:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tlPhH-0000lJ-1P for 75205-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:51:51 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tlPhB-0003Hr-Ev; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 04:51:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=jvwJ1GYDoLN0r02gg7ZEiD26tQbooVDplt4+SdcgyDg=; b=EynKpRw9bzxloxI5YX7a bvsEm2K+Xv7lUAcuxAmETRI+dhRQEFylSgFS2vVQdrcDpMRjeUoe7T+8zmceX5giWk+RqEIxHfB5V a1oeVcfqz32QqZ8rSc87s9HNik5TPFW8O/nXc5YqjnvLRpFNGv2RIO94/9DBgko8xR2F6TGq1/Ou0 TBN8aMBT6BJrPgOkfCRKae65xQNCIP56vLbg8t3BnQ1Dnm4mOHZRW+04JdMI6Xs8zIhqNRkcbZujF 4NJ8VRY2aDZcQKcnSGdOR1dZc3zacGlhe3DrYXYOtcR5yGse4lBrUXoK1nzkE2iF3AR+l0CLWQtTB wNkL/9oyEKqTuw==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Dariqq Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] syscalls: Remove wrong syscall ID for =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98kexec=5Fload=5Ffile=E2=80=99?= on i686. In-Reply-To: <9125798d-4d27-4d83-9f82-774dfef9fda3@posteo.net> (dariqq@posteo.net's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:25:38 +0000") References: <6062eaed018a8c738577dbb699d7e0324a4f8746.1736168031.git.ludo@gnu.org> <9125798d-4d27-4d83-9f82-774dfef9fda3@posteo.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 3 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Violier X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87tt8nd3rm.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 75205-done Cc: 75205-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Dariqq skribis: > Can #75205 be closed now? With the update to guix in > d7157cca1053d82041e4fc294f9a5f13e2cf612b the package builds again for > i686: Yes, done! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:16:37 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator