GNU bug report logs - #75144
[PATCH] machine: Implement 'hetzner-environment-type'.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Roman Scherer <roman <at> burningswell.com>

Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 16:48:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #64 received at 75144 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Roman Scherer <roman <at> burningswell.com>
To: Roman Scherer <roman <at> burningswell.com>
Cc: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>,
 Florian Pelz <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>, 75144 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#75144] [PATCH v3 2/2] machine: Implement
 'hetzner-environment-type'.
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:24:31 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

I just send another patch for the news entry to this bug number.

Could someone please review it?

Thanks, Roman

Roman Scherer <roman <at> burningswell.com> writes:

> Hi Ludo, and everyone still listening,
>
> thanks for merging it and your help on this! I plan to submit a news
> entry patch tomorrow.
>
> I don't have the time for a blog post unfortunatly. Too busy with other
> things at the moment, sorry. :/ Maybe another time.
>
> Another feedback I wanted to mention. We should really aim to improve on
> substitute availability and stability of Guix if we want people to rely
> on Guix and `guix deploy`. I think this was also mentioned in the
> survey.
>
> While working on this the user experience of guix deploy really
> shined/falled, depending on substitute availability and stability. I'm
> probably biased and having bad luck with aarch-64 based Guix systems.
>
> For example, using the ARM based servers (which are cheaper than x86)
> with Guix on Hetzner can lead to a headache if you or the the servers
> you deploy to start building Rust and friends. :/
>
> I think we get there, thanks again, and happy hacking!
>
> Roman
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hello Roman,
>>
>> Applied with the one-line change below.
>>
>> I wasn’t able to run tests that require an API token because I don’t
>> have one (but I may well give that a try eventually); other tests went
>> well.
>>
>> Feel free to submit an entry for ‘etc/news.scm’ (make sure to provide
>> enough context so users can tell whether this is something of interest
>> to them).  A blog post for guix.gnu.org/blog showing how you use it and
>> how it’s implemented would also be welcome if you feel so inclined!
>>
>> Thanks for all the work!
>>
>> Ludo’.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 122 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.