GNU bug report logs - #74870
cl-labels and cl-flet don't create named blocks

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jan Jouleodov <jouleodov <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 74870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Jan Jouleodov <jouleodov <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 74870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#74870: cl-labels and cl-flet don't create named blocks
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:14:54 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>> Is there any reason why one would not want to *always* emulate the CL
>> behavior in cl-lib? I could only think of a backward compatibility
>> problem before CL was standardized, but I am not familiar with the time
>> frame of cl-lib to know if that's really the case.
> Could you try the patch below?

Never mind, it here's a better one I just pushed to `master`.


        Stefan
[cl-labels.patch (text/x-diff, inline)]
commit 476426168106dbcee67d8ea667e11ebe80c7aaed
Author: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Date:   Sat Dec 21 11:13:07 2024 -0500

    (cl-flet, cl-labels): Fix bug#74870
    
    * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (cl-flet, cl-labels): Wrap function
    bodies in `cl-block`.
    
    * test/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs-tests.el (cl-macs--test-flet-block): New test.

diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
index 65bc2cb9173..b1c42a23acd 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
@@ -2071,7 +2071,8 @@ cl-flet
 FUNC is the function name, and EXP is an expression that returns the
 function value to which it should be bound, or it can take the more common
 form (FUNC ARGLIST BODY...) which is a shorthand
-for (FUNC (lambda ARGLIST BODY)).
+for (FUNC (lambda ARGLIST BODY)) where BODY is wrapped in
+a `cl-block' named FUNC.
 
 FUNC is defined only within FORM, not BODY, so you can't write
 recursive function definitions.  Use `cl-labels' for that.  See
@@ -2096,15 +2097,22 @@ cl-flet
                    cl-declarations body)))
   (let ((binds ()) (newenv macroexpand-all-environment))
     (dolist (binding bindings)
-      (let ((var (make-symbol (format "--cl-%s--" (car binding))))
-            (args-and-body (cdr binding)))
-        (if (and (= (length args-and-body) 1)
-                 (macroexp-copyable-p (car args-and-body)))
+      (let* ((var (make-symbol (format "--cl-%s--" (car binding))))
+             (args-and-body (cdr binding))
+             (args (car args-and-body))
+             (body (cdr args-and-body)))
+        (if (and (null body)
+                 (macroexp-copyable-p args))
             ;; Optimize (cl-flet ((fun var)) body).
-            (setq var (car args-and-body))
-          (push (list var (if (= (length args-and-body) 1)
-                              (car args-and-body)
-                            `(cl-function (lambda . ,args-and-body))))
+            (setq var args)
+          (push (list var (if (null body)
+                              args
+                            (let ((parsed-body (macroexp-parse-body body)))
+                              `(cl-function
+                                (lambda ,args
+                                  ,@(car parsed-body)
+                                  (cl-block ,(car binding)
+                                    ,@(cdr parsed-body)))))))
                 binds))
 	(push (cons (car binding)
                     (lambda (&rest args)
@@ -2271,10 +2279,11 @@ cl-labels
 where EXP is a form that should return the function to bind to the
 function name FUNC, or (FUNC ARGLIST BODY...) where
 FUNC is the function name, ARGLIST its arguments, and BODY the
-forms of the function body.  FUNC is in scope in any BODY or EXP, as well
-as FORM, so you can write recursive and mutually recursive
-function definitions, with the caveat that EXPs are evaluated in sequence
-and you cannot call a FUNC before its EXP has been evaluated.
+forms of the function body.  BODY is wrapped in a `cl-block' named FUNC.
+FUNC is in scope in any BODY or EXP, as well as in FORM, so you can write
+recursive and mutually recursive function definitions, with the caveat
+that EXPs are evaluated in sequence and you cannot call a FUNC before its
+EXP has been evaluated.
 See info node `(cl) Function Bindings' for details.
 
 \(fn ((FUNC ARGLIST BODY...) ...) FORM...)"
@@ -2282,7 +2291,7 @@ cl-labels
   (let ((binds ()) (newenv macroexpand-all-environment))
     (dolist (binding bindings)
       (let ((var (make-symbol (format "--cl-%s--" (car binding)))))
-	(push (cons var (cdr binding)) binds)
+	(push (cons var binding) binds)
 	(push (cons (car binding)
                     (lambda (&rest args)
                       (if (eq (car args) cl--labels-magic)
@@ -2295,12 +2304,18 @@ cl-labels
     ;; Perform self-tail call elimination.
     `(letrec ,(mapcar
                (lambda (bind)
-                 (pcase-let* ((`(,var ,sargs . ,sbody) bind))
+                 (pcase-let* ((`(,var ,fun ,sargs . ,sbody) bind))
                    `(,var ,(cl--self-tco-on-form
                             var (macroexpand-all
                                  (if (null sbody)
                                      sargs ;A (FUNC EXP) definition.
-                                   `(cl-function (lambda ,sargs . ,sbody)))
+                                   (let ((parsed-body
+                                          (macroexp-parse-body sbody)))
+                                     `(cl-function
+                                       (lambda ,sargs
+                                         ,@(car parsed-body)
+                                         (cl-block ,fun
+                                           ,@(cdr parsed-body))))))
                                  newenv)))))
                (nreverse binds))
        . ,(macroexp-unprogn
diff --git a/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs-tests.el b/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs-tests.el
index 4baf5428101..e1a521dca79 100644
--- a/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs-tests.el
+++ b/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs-tests.el
@@ -718,6 +718,16 @@ cl-macs--labels
                            (f lex-var)))))
       (should (equal (f nil) 'a)))))
 
+(ert-deftest cl-macs--test-flet-block ()
+  (should (equal (cl-block f1
+                   (cl-flet ((f1 (a) (cons (cl-return-from f1 a) 6)))
+                    (cons (f1 5) 6)))
+                 '(5 . 6)))
+  (should (equal (cl-block f1
+                   (cl-labels ((f1 (a) (cons (cl-return-from f1 a) 6)))
+                     (cons (f1 7) 8)))
+                 '(7 . 8))))
+
 (ert-deftest cl-flet/edebug ()
   "Check that we can instrument `cl-flet' forms (bug#65344)."
   (with-temp-buffer

This bug report was last modified 137 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.