GNU bug report logs - #74831
31.0.50; scratch/igc: segfaults on startup when called under gdb

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph <at> gmx.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 74831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74831: 31.0.50; scratch/igc: segfaults on startup when called under gdb
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:53:50 +0100

Hi Eli,
* Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> [2024-12-12; 18:43 +02]:
>> From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph <at> gmx.net>
>> Cc: 74831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:15:45 +0100
>>
>> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> >> 0x0000555555779816 in XSETCDR (c=..., n=n <at> entry=...) at ./src/lisp.h:1605
>> >> 1605	  *xcdr_addr (c) = n;
>> >
>> > So what is the value of xcdr_addr(s) here?  It looks like
>> > dereferencing it causes the segfault, so its value might give us some
>> > hints.
>>
>> sorry, I'm clueless:
>>
>> (gdb) print xcdr_addr
>> No symbol "xcdr_addr" in current context.
>
> No, you should say
>
>   (gdb) print xcdr_addr(c)

this I also tried:

(gdb) print xcdr_addr(c)
No symbol "xcdr_addr" in current context.


>> > Also, where did you start GDB?  It looks like you started it not from
>> > the Emacs' src/ directory,
>>
>> I started it in the Emacs src directory::
>>
>> (gdb) pwd
>> Working directory /home/grfz/src/emacs-igc2/src.
>>
>> because you once told me to do so for
>> gdb.
>
> That's strange, because if you did that, the backtrace command would
> have shown a Lisp backtrace as well, which didn't happen.
>
>> I now added
>>
>>  -ex "source /home/grfz/src/emacs-igc2/src/.gdbinit"
>>
>> to my gdb invocation and tried again.
>> Now there are plenty of
>>
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>
> That's expected.
>
>> lines in GDBs output but Emacs runs and
>> and (not so far) functions correct.
>>
>> > before running Emacs.  That's because the MPS library uses SIGSEGV for
>> > its memory barriers, and .gdbinit there makes sure such SIGSEGVs don't
>> > stop Emacs.  IOW, this could be a false positive, not a real segfault.
>>
>> That seemed to be the case.
>
> Yes.
>
> I think we can close this bug now.


Fine with me.

Regards, gregor

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.