GNU bug report logs - #74813
31.0.50; scroll-down is 10x slower and laggy than scroll-up

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eval Exec <execvy <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:01:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 31.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: execvy <at> gmail.com
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 74813 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74813: 31.0.50; scroll-down is 10x slower and laggy than scroll-up
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:04:47 +0800
My auto-repeat rate is 100 times/second

It's hard to notice performance difference by eyes and hands.
You can do profiler-start (cpu) and profiler-report, then you will notice
the profiler result is totally different.

On 1/10/25 4:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:30:34 +0800
> > From: execvy <at> gmail.com
> >
> > I try to reproduce on `emacs -Q` for this file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/refs/heads/master/src/secp256k1/src/precomputed_ecmult.c
> >
> > It's fundamental-mode, then I notice `C-v` and `M-v` 's scroll-up and scroll-down have performance difference: C-v is more smoother than scroll-up.
> 
> I've now tried that file in fundamental-mode, and I don't see any
> perceptible differences between C-v and M-v.  For example, scrolling
> from top to bottom by leaning on C-v takes 35 sec, and scrolling
> bottom to top with M-v takes the same 35 sec.
> 
> What is your auto-repeat rate for the keyboard?  That is, if you press
> and hold C-v, how many key presses per second does your system
> produce?
> 




This bug report was last modified 171 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.