GNU bug report logs -
#74785
27.1; Fill-paragraph in RST mode does not respect line blocks
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Ping! Stefan Merten, did you have time to have another look?
> From: Stefan Merten <stefan <at> merten-home.de>
> cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, James Cloos <cloos <at> jhcloos.com>,
> 74785 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rb <at> ravenbrook.com
> Comments: In-reply-to Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> message dated "Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:07:08 -0500."
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 17:50:48 +0100
>
> Hi guys!
>
> 6 days ago Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> But that bug is about message-mode, not about rst-mode, so I'm not
> >> sure it is the same problem.
> >
> > It's not (that bug was about a prefix shared by lines of a paragraph,
> > whereas this bug is about a prefix which starts a new paragraph).
>
> Sorry, but it's not that simple. The syntax of reStructuredText is
> pretty tricky and it needs lots of good ideas to handle it. But it's
> nice to write and read - and that's is why it IMHO is still a
> worthwhile alternative.
>
> If it would be as simple as you suggest, I would have built it in from
> the start. There is a reason for not doing it. Indeed line blocks were
> at the end of my list of supported reST features because I think they
> are used rarely.
>
> The function `rst-line-tabs' has a FIXME comment:
>
> ;; FIXME: Must consider other tabs:
> ;; * Line blocks
> ;; * Definition lists
> ;; * Option lists
>
> I guess the real problem is in that second line, that line blocks are
> not yet supported.
>
> I'll look into this.
>
>
> Grüße
>
> Stefan
>
>
This bug report was last modified 151 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.