From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:05:27 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#74780 <74780@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#74780 <74780@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Reply-To: bug#74780 <74780@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:05:27 +0000 retitle 74780 Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch reassign 74780 guix-patches submitter 74780 John Kehayias severity 74780 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 11 01:33:21 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2024 06:33:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tLGHc-0007HS-KZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 01:33:21 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34942) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tLGHY-0007HI-C5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 01:33:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLGFS-0004Ky-6B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 01:31:02 -0500 Received: from mail-0201.mail-europe.com ([51.77.79.158]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLGFM-0008Pi-8N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 01:31:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1733898647; x=1734157847; bh=Ab2DpWz2ppXtbR+QWKZ3gCCK5HyD+uAd1Oj5Bu/V24g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector: List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=BvWvgQ2/M7Pc6B8Ce3qEi3SDJwkQfnzPESPiQxE1HHrvMEzmiz/Cg2KP1avMwlNsy q85xPEVofBn+suTNkAezrzQRra41qnjBoDsq2ZJOCVX4/eOr9VggnEyX9BPVh60o3w ngHNPJiqX5ahHlS7nLgLR3z3cNoXo4jtWwEdxR7ZRpQ8xKazVN1/25UlXzlMFoN1Ic kLqymehKsjrCwN18WoQTDC1DiUcUBpVDoBg3Y076/JSS2ZnsE77P6IByIanvZWD32+ keVbe/rM4BHXg/EcE98F+9+fckLvaWyhrTaLPHY56dsLS8bPTPJG0K8HHQWH9fEzi3 3wcKPftPCACrg== Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 06:30:42 +0000 To: "guix-patches@gnu.org" From: John Kehayias Subject: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 514d97354d408a4755e08277073a1b6ccefaf30a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.77.79.158; envelope-from=john.kehayias@protonmail.com; helo=mail-0201.mail-europe.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi Guix, Currently the mesa-updates branch just has a few updates which seem to have= built fine (on x86_64 at least), see . I don't know of other pending changes other than a libva update I'll see ab= out. Perhaps we can do some ungrafting too? John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 20 15:32:16 2024 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2024 20:32:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44206 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tOjfT-0004lN-Ud for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:32:16 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:41745) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tOjfR-0004l7-P0 for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:32:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1734726727; x=1734985927; bh=i+m7Pgg/wJkT+9YHerimqEQkXU9hPU5D2FaG8NGZmNY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=w/p9GwgM/6Jmg1cQZ5Gd+FLy5u0js6MzyYzSgKk7OPFYBUuTOxXg/CsJrzbZfvF7z OMdzd3BSqdJN1mgSeXH1DqUjNsxmRH/nQvrnJTbwIGObe4SG3V9UIMUBN1XGxgGOCz NyBj6/APiASqdtK6YhyWu+mWnOQUcUkrD6c2gJdYeILEYV213HME/uJPLYfNvhsoj6 umV1vKjnO9qVtTvuQZIGyK0vADfXDdTh2RuPX8oBlFt8uCC/NNebxdDAD4qEUSoG1b BwWggS26P9nQ+dfK5qbbHkKolMIOkYs/dTxTeIkEORYwu+TFgcnWLoqoMaj41JUFug 6ciUfq6mBRAQA== Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:31:57 +0000 To: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 24c30da0f9634668422fcfe656b7c2bd326a1290 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780 Cc: Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:30 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi Guix, > > Currently the mesa-updates branch just has a few updates which seem to > have built fine (on x86_64 at least), see > . > > I don't know of other pending changes other than a libva update I'll > see about. Perhaps we can do some ungrafting too? > > John (CC-ing Efraim after the patch to build the asahi vulkan driver on aarch64-linux) I just rebased on master after further updating wayland-protocols and mesa to their very freshest versions. Not much else going on here, so maybe just let this build and then merge to keep things current. Unfortunately the QA page hasn't shown a status for this branch but I'll check later. There are discussions about libglvnd support in Mesa I need to chime in on, so we could tackle that, but not until the new year for me. That will require a decent number of changes and lots more testing, so my preference would be to merge this branch when substitutes are available and then immediately work on libglvnd or whatever else is pending. John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 11:33:15 2024 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2024 16:33:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tP2Pj-0003t2-8h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:33:15 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:58867) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tP2Ph-0003sr-6i for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:33:14 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4362bae4d7dso21104275e9.1 for <74780@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:33:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1734798732; x=1735403532; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bwdCWCRwJNRWxbf+SntSzqCmLyNDFRZLNX9G7BPGyF8=; b=QBMAC0w9kWDEbLuBIg2SO55M9QBe0LS533hPY8dPaneXJHEHh5jaKt21az+is6jQVw neyZD3W+D2hD9qT8cxn0OChJG1+Dk1UHHDF/nlNhoOj9Lfl7DiYkdMepMLeKTp33infJ 715+mqw/lHSGInS+tUU4fAEtwjik6Vxe5wk1WduagwajM/VAxlAsmoitYcyq2wHfsifL gV6OwgRe49SDYHbXhLImo+gfFmxfCHwaFmmQb5ZdqoCz6X3UKcuIvXvSXIXcUlHu4kWU 2fgD3ltrgrJkA5AQsC2G+iwoQHdZSOYMA81F75Gom/wPSqwtlMYaSdf5aXI7NaW+KJD9 KhqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734798732; x=1735403532; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bwdCWCRwJNRWxbf+SntSzqCmLyNDFRZLNX9G7BPGyF8=; b=V+hrixCH9FyABiFK+MNIuVnpo7tV9CyQE/XkUQTCE9omGvXfeSPndKzlAUxvYCWBAO pSh+gwdBePW/zqcHIh60c1RWfwLOfwEaxwk2AaoGt39FWIPo3TqfJ6SbXA1Tm9RAWH5U 6TNKR56aGNWJRECd/ZBw3Hu6PzwCvLrvkBz0jwOj3fj5AJFYNXjH5C8dirjDyYfQfePP cX4IOB/kZ9BBn1SP0Rs8OCeHsZkGFzLiW79091LtJH428vzu21vdkUJ1ohAMD1pSTRp2 s7Nhv8Nh48PuxiSEhtstJcE7ZTyGjWnH4po1Zmp0TPVhoPHXbRVP0n5vwDojwX7mujGv Btlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyzlC/kY7EJQGYR3rR4BfOrLLdt1OFrEYPvLpaN5AL7pBFm5ta7 d/WTqnw723GaqxSDP//9aZugAiksCQDLBsBCoqaewkTSu/eYU+/3 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsjNFTtJ4XDprvl538dk+RN4MfyPNE07fzIEX3Pyxz86LW48L71O9GNydhUy2A KIbNc50bB9qWP0b0MvM0T//0GYTm7irzUhSw5kBpltFcoE0u2S2rHX4hXCn80QTDDfpYS5EdZC4 KLpdzGWs75EcbF6wwRHxLWKVBtW2p3b3jfU5xhslkKUgpJ1N3NB+2ac/lbbxgq3pEVkq1F2OBda ygY5nzCxW9iigenmgudbNZAkiSyoSE+rYgjCtwmfp7JSu+4Iw5nqht+0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH2hAJTZST/VcFyhSR32SORGRa3UFtm+tIj5wLkVNqGWJslz6S/VsZAyxf1nFIxY8OGcdOGkA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:6b09:b0:434:eb86:aeca with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43675cb208bmr20200495e9.10.1734798731490; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([188.120.128.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43661200abesm79506075e9.18.2024.12.21.08.32.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:32:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 18:32:07 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: John Kehayias Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , John Kehayias , 74780@debbugs.gnu.org References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5D6x6zU5d05Qsf30" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780 Cc: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --5D6x6zU5d05Qsf30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 08:31:57PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:30 AM, John Kehayias wrote: >=20 > > Hi Guix, > > > > Currently the mesa-updates branch just has a few updates which seem to > > have built fine (on x86_64 at least), see > > . > > > > I don't know of other pending changes other than a libva update I'll > > see about. Perhaps we can do some ungrafting too? > > > > John >=20 > (CC-ing Efraim after the patch to build the asahi vulkan driver on > aarch64-linux) I didn't test it (I don't have the hardware), but it built just fine and I assume the Asahi people know what they're doing. > I just rebased on master after further updating wayland-protocols and > mesa to their very freshest versions. I'll rebuild again on a couple of architectures but I don't expect any issues. > Not much else going on here, so maybe just let this build and then merge > to keep things current. Unfortunately the QA page hasn't shown a status > for this branch but I'll check later. >=20 > There are discussions about libglvnd support in Mesa I need to chime in > on, so we could tackle that, but not until the new year for me. That > will require a decent number of changes and lots more testing, so my > preference would be to merge this branch when substitutes are available > and then immediately work on libglvnd or whatever else is pending. That makes sense. Regular smallish updates are one of the reasons for the team/topic -based branches. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --5D6x6zU5d05Qsf30 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmdm7YQACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GHiRAAq3fcbPEbdpwbyNjtL+3ciUly8JqqDb3aQ+iczPRGf2XZPm/jRWMFRSf5 tjm3tiZRA+/nmxWaHOmfqhk408DhzYWICg12ibRdWEYRah7lfAOf+qcuzWUt0DO/ M31KAh8f5tOyA/+NhammCkoUsEDW8/BARdVzRFjQD37JUBJ2S3bMxwVmcSl5+rpv wVu/NQt2dw4Fhm8vuFVh75ZAeSqmZLWTMrMcur7UxUCM1SmCOCg8/o7brG+BZYjI uwI7QG2+Oln0N0Ptfq2adPOWsd3mbITra3VwSbbdjYqupHs8GwnTyz45lBGfNvog COcWSDIoqfCWwoLtuNAvGzE5VVWX6JfppdCIWuX0v+2Fk22QUdUmKGGsYryzdb+A ChQJUJ1sWHlNIrDTQfOAnFfrF4c0Z/MbR5/apm7prBeA7AVuFpbkGDs6ICdEKUyx svaNs6qOfhwi5gfZAyxEGtYZUOunLp5daKWSYRyk2TZ2zmVp2ejbGwwD6r5XjRIh rdC7bZLOyixuxOeyUd+/E1eomuq8A6AOiK1IOSqzjFmcLk1JcIRg0MUAm3rkikcU cWSRmTrlJ1ewzJLQB7W8rYXx5wlabNtLGkYgyXUvizH/IV8pbPVb9VVr1B4fbGol E4vf8qI6tEqqmmYGBYHgRvmOqlGAOHozG1iDhSRAYkIrmxXxDtc= =CSnj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5D6x6zU5d05Qsf30-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 22 04:20:45 2024 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2024 09:20:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tPI8j-0000ak-3e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 04:20:45 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:51599) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tPI8e-0000aa-EO for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 04:20:44 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-388cae9eb9fso1866644f8f.3 for <74780@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 01:20:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1734859179; x=1735463979; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g96OWzxzaIQN7EKveanFDCO3nb7PBXxyc3RDNObjcko=; b=iTcj2BypbGHAB3YRplMICoi2k36uaXm7tBV9/YWelCUCyFaCRuBUULfEHlqbSBloZF UVFY7AspHuOM8BHQJ8eQRJOSmuLctz65S7VOSLU8i0DHfY7dSOjrMTSexqIgi/3hquL0 aGDQEK9f7PtC+44zWpqXbPy+/dvXgkPzqy6W/aQdARF8FQdeRen89dAhXAzGcRHWbxQc 0PP6LUmBZzMHar69faC9MQKYAO4ZkhFVOB8ssIHVPFypar2yvEtVN0rcgzKNgZOB9yWL xPtrIxBL3uhyupdanwmPW3tzieHoEC3Rj0q703lhb3rqtt+TBXydYRJFsbPQaAy7sK/A QhoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734859179; x=1735463979; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g96OWzxzaIQN7EKveanFDCO3nb7PBXxyc3RDNObjcko=; b=crxU8kVmczHy/lqnUvB695ng2vS4+7u3o/qUVyjki7I0gnHs878s0tM8o5ScqDG7nn t4r6/GlwxS603k2tzsgEu2u8ED1zEpuLeUpFp6kCy8DS/q75oUhHX7XeuFjCtWv1kIpQ FQVMau1Eg7IYuZVHwwrufSd0UEd5rT714Ak1QLC5O5Kqjn++plTLB4d3P+BnEYnPWeT5 T7YLCwVCVbMkj4mQz5L4thb8/Ss269YS/YSijDE+ObPBj2XYzzy8hIZBs/MfqrGLDLED VP+V9qCjfC+F7Gcl6tC6/Ruy6A9knmtRcjUBuE/wNzIQleQjw5rMFpmqVAOWadtt/WCi cL/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyfLUfbkpvOifSbVnxLPRn0boUqvopl2pkA+KY2h0d+TSJdVkXo 4av13ToVrXg/NJ6D8NBAZU6O4WTCfoIIEXqnijoos9YHY7xH/49D X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsF8wQWp+F3FtPP5HCy/0uBVZnAyS7INWGSiygTQn3APQFex6pGBBtnKLunskj T8d9k7x6jCSEJNkUwmDLXz81KVNUsFCsEjyPfqLL8XHXQkY0NOzrwZtRNRKRKg9zqWPehz8z1Qd C/KyPVKdbWM0Yd4mvuH9rUhOOA0cTcDuo/tYdbtZb1bQDYT1WdwLfrU2Jw2c2XfiF3YrFiP0ZjS sVFWd/ncOiyfnPfFbuhxDmyJlRuSUYMU8jR63q3nJETTrveyEc0jIUHIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEivoxeBzkF2NnB2ZApsmHC7qkbobuWNncENIu3rdBiQ796cNwHrc0tMQ4VPUMibIv+dcMFIw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5e09:0:b0:386:1cd3:8a0e with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38a22406ddemr9206928f8f.48.1734859179161; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 01:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([188.120.128.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38a1c829297sm8681055f8f.4.2024.12.22.01.19.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 22 Dec 2024 01:19:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 11:19:36 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: John Kehayias Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner , John Kehayias , 74780@debbugs.gnu.org References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tbCxY0zN8/pkCWzO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780 Cc: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --tbCxY0zN8/pkCWzO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 08:31:57PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:30 AM, John Kehayias wrote: >=20 > > Hi Guix, > > > > Currently the mesa-updates branch just has a few updates which seem to > > have built fine (on x86_64 at least), see > > . > > > > I don't know of other pending changes other than a libva update I'll > > see about. Perhaps we can do some ungrafting too? > > > > John >=20 > (CC-ing Efraim after the patch to build the asahi vulkan driver on > aarch64-linux) >=20 > I just rebased on master after further updating wayland-protocols and > mesa to their very freshest versions. >=20 > Not much else going on here, so maybe just let this build and then merge > to keep things current. Unfortunately the QA page hasn't shown a status > for this branch but I'll check later. >=20 > There are discussions about libglvnd support in Mesa I need to chime in > on, so we could tackle that, but not until the new year for me. That > will require a decent number of changes and lots more testing, so my > preference would be to merge this branch when substitutes are available > and then immediately work on libglvnd or whatever else is pending. I built mesa for aarch64, armhf, riscv64 and powerpc64le. They all built without any problems. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --tbCxY0zN8/pkCWzO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmdn2aQACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1G95w//WSW464VH1XWJepEpjvt183Ns18EsiFMuiRzFBz7CTVtVJiMxPd5fEM5/ pWD1AExhrP+DTUEPDKZpF4PQQvfORTMEO3LQMw4nS4HVUguzKr/OwKgIBHDBs8OB 5dfHAj6zKeo7uMBRuuYwfHKi9Nhv+r0sNHDAI3XkUZZI4FVLVKJVCwwPxhkhgXug scW8svo86UxNp1EGXDaVyaaUef5mtZHqqA2OJ3J1r7l3U7xS7C8d1N6jqod4KwHJ 9eLP/X9BvsYzPjGpTxvpaXaNVHbS7A98ACyag1E1/itCyIgJNf4sftN2Ht9kiTHV FZrvs/ZGY9hPKQI7iqZrfQiM2rRHJrTmabkuxsuO3gwa7xwknY387lsx+TSr3Hss uvK+wqnZY6vV7djsD1m1MPPk3S2AW/wDK6hIXUJ4YtAJUHjnj95xIM+1xFUpjkPP T21wDfnNKbiyOZGW0Bct9STIdtlGxnRXZ/vGwlfGSG3lYugOU3My1XQkTaoRL+iN 5KVyWAdeDi0O1J0QmW/bljh/cMYzcyFJCL8eh2JJfivTk79WWyqDWmd6xRxEkvOj DdYdp8ta2dUzsrg+aM/J/Bp74BIDsRVVyRDtr+Gz5eX3klyJZUAfvjG4476RHHte 4Qx82HeO25vRzl6V9HJGFnzKTUAe2A6ET91rKFyETA/9kwb84Ds= =EnNL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tbCxY0zN8/pkCWzO-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 29 09:58:07 2024 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2024 14:58:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRuk2-0004Nl-Ln for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:58:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRuk1-0004NH-DA for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:58:05 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRujv-0004xj-Q6; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:57:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=XILycr7tcu+kzc11XKXVCHRFXGTlmLnuSbsk2Hg6nBc=; b=DX682sbXz9NrsRapvtCc L2Cmgl0isa/k5NI/yLPSx94F1GGUPuzxIcdzXYolRJuZgqBVT8y7mc/SQKb71Wd2FCz6WpDpwHW1W sxVz75X5Fa4araVRaFm26mHPdvZHYZ0zjbH0tzLKw5HPnZ8SKpydOdKhQMsrL+8u7G2ThY7/fg2XE azHtcB4dxWTxlDUcwe23UxK8H7Mgp4IkxNrFS6voUpRMjyssqu+T6GJO66k9E04jm00YexDkQFroj 87pdOM2C86MObMf4ylJhvmhf1G74NNMMhYyQElJMJ3PflM8CMMizOBMGdLcXv17XbrG+3Cuhfq228 32W2mKEGudGo4w==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sun, 22 Dec 2024 11:19:36 +0200") References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:57:51 +0100 Message-ID: <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780 Cc: John Kehayias , 74780@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey John and all, It=E2=80=99s the turn of the =E2=80=9Cmesa-updates=E2=80=9D branch to be me= rged: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 29 21:47:01 2024 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2024 02:47:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5o5-0003ja-Er for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:47:01 -0500 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:61439) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5nx-0003j2-Je for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:46:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1735526806; x=1735786006; bh=xVnQ0WhTjXb9nY2uMUDUZDGh/KPizOppSbxwv4a9o5g=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=WuHoZn/fGUE3ALhR4ZOervdxnDeqk/EQpkGH+EqJtoeTQepcLlVqPBA5VruJQVpue d3S2WlyMD7/qYxRNh6G+ZvKQXlj0XC/OOPh2hl5I4APOR05v6Q8pBUu5YuaZgfezGf jE8NyB2TJvR0Qq0ha5ikgzioch7p7ngbXhzd/wGe7X/UhIu7wBx1ZOtLBzLq0u4G81 1nuwkq27xe9w9aCPKDqp4ymfe/uiZsvFwihtDojAnHzmnv6rfccTfcmmirJGzsUN4I qYHfEcYaY6i9vrCVGHruPkJkUATqa2Vc7y9ty8HyBISX+we8TCa3FOUVWgqahjk2o1 xivGWv3SL0HCA== Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:46:43 +0000 To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87ed1pnb02.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: fb3eb5775a1c042a685eccc68b83b69067db9617 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780 Cc: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi all, On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 03:57 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hey John and all, > > It=E2=80=99s the turn of the =E2=80=9Cmesa-updates=E2=80=9D branch to be = merged: > > > > :-) > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Thanks for checking in. I just rebased and pushed. I'll keep an eye on it but didn't notice any big failures (plenty on earlier evaluations but mostly due to the python merge from what I can tell). The question is what the substitute coverage will be like on non-x86_64-linux. It had already been about 9-10 days from the last update and didn't seem like much progress. And with QA back up but very behind, not sure if we expect that to tell us anything soon. Should I give it a day or so to build the current rebase and then just merge? From Efraim's local builds and given the nature of the commits, I don't expect any big surprises. (Side note: does i686-linux have priority on Berlin or something like that? The last few weeks I notice many more active i686 builds after a push with many pending builds. The current evaluation, for instance: the vast majority of workers are idle, and then the vast majority of active are i686 builds. Or is that from just generally being behind on i686 so there's just more of that to do?) Thanks! John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 04 00:34:30 2025 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2025 05:34:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwnu-0002bp-23 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:34:30 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:13607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwnr-0002bW-Nw for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:34:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1735968861; x=1736228061; bh=MJw9G/f3qtHm0i457t7ssXJOQGiqUq7Txz3w10GFh1w=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=bzphlC8EckXmzduJb6/PE9C+Ec9+oREjQxSjnqK0M+MtME/9rlRWnO3T0jFg1T2L8 kmP0Pra/IcDDhhzYgs7uzIyqTi6h+/BdqfmVoImQuGiJaWVOAJi1pHfVLawgNNX4JD o3XmwiuejdPN9lphk4F27cBom90FDi3xNaVATR3JIHcrO1lf0wlTGjJMDY2JkiRqO+ eOHkulkwTrH7U/Rk5uYLWUcAg1qnAr56aNB6TERQiaw+xa/n5unHJzmVJgN5MiayQ3 cWHZzqyU56NzSy0xxWU+ZcbHSyQRifmTc4lDz0v85Md97qU95VzhjHTSSMcqC1V4Bo iFJxH/y+vxwxw== Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:34:17 +0000 To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87y0zrdtwq.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: f94545286613408cda8111db31188749cb58919b MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780 Cc: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 09:46 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 03:57 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Hey John and all, >> >> It=E2=80=99s the turn of the =E2=80=9Cmesa-updates=E2=80=9D branch to be= merged: >> >> >> >> :-) >> >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Thanks for checking in. > > I just rebased and pushed. I'll keep an eye on it but didn't notice > any big failures (plenty on earlier evaluations but mostly due to the > python merge from what I can tell). > > The question is what the substitute coverage will be like on > non-x86_64-linux. It had already been about 9-10 days from the last > update and didn't seem like much progress. And with QA back up but > very behind, not sure if we expect that to tell us anything soon. > > Should I give it a day or so to build the current rebase and then just > merge? From Efraim's local builds and given the nature of the commits, > I don't expect any big surprises. > > (Side note: does i686-linux have priority on Berlin or something like > that? The last few weeks I notice many more active i686 builds after a > push with many pending builds. The current evaluation, for instance: > the vast majority of workers are idle, and then the vast majority of > active are i686 builds. Or is that from just generally being behind on > i686 so there's just more of that to do?) > > Thanks! > John QA page still hasn't updated and it has been another 5 days from the last message. Unless there are any objections I'll do a rebase and merge later this weekend. John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 04 12:38:39 2025 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2025 17:38:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tU86h-0003pz-2P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 12:38:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53744) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tU86f-0003pi-0a for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 12:38:37 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU86Z-0004T4-2Z; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 12:38:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=YDR5KM7MtyPdp3OGKM8Ffx0TSo7yZOo9oWA271OedJE=; b=PngMtte99YWHV6vlLA8z f/MdcIk7CPZI2wBDfYHeyB3BtUvOoIYp3SREF+JPzVmV0O1NdSsQkoTSo7NgYCLlz6a45M8WNrL8m Tbz1Rk8yVefEXTtRaIDhUzdFlM4ufAjhVlnLgkXx9v0AS+cy1ChpUeyd57h7cftFoNqijG9agLkON B8mgqB+IQVfOX7VnJGUKU9ukj0sxPESpuNBgzB12E3X9bGPlSL6pxAr92KNvNl4WMoiCCDATzW8I8 GKafUQ6CIX0E5zjv1KfzOz6sfL2D8jJ+g1POpYDGslYJQhvxJNgR7Rv+76djGHhvUp61pGL37U+jD oILkW+2c2KgvGQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: John Kehayias Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87y0zrdtwq.fsf@protonmail.com> (John Kehayias's message of "Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:34:17 +0000") References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87y0zrdtwq.fsf@protonmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 15 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 233 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Lapin X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 18:38:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87ed1iqy26.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780 Cc: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi John, John Kehayias skribis: > QA page still hasn't updated and it has been another 5 days from the > last message. Unless there are any objections I'll do a rebase and > merge later this weekend. Sure. Please do check the situation at and how it compares to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99. You can check that direct dependents of packages that were upgraded still build fine. For example, =E2=80=9Cguix build -P1 mesa --no-grafts -n= -v1=E2=80=9D will indicate whether substitutes are available for all of the direct dependents of =E2=80=98mesa=E2=80=99, meaning that they were successfully b= uilt. Thanks for working on this! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 05 21:11:23 2025 Received: (at 74780-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2025 02:11:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36132 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUcaR-0003Q5-1U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 21:11:23 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:33255) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tUcaJ-0003Pf-Hq for 74780-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 21:11:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1736129468; x=1736388668; bh=tABPuNJJ8CFz/e4vAZMEO841xhYAKEUasjl7wlB9ONs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=FiYPiD3Nehh+dy9MQuJpiGAtDVllI7T6nW+gtIaUw5YSODZguDVZKiSi75vq9LIGN XptWneo62mz1nSXElyEPYr77aYUX1Hs3irYZ9cCvLQQc3FvyXJ/+DXfBW7YOtSlLTs qRdERb23Y+3Njcrxb3yYjNZ1g4pHSVM8KZCzsHq6grm160gbgTVbAqBCrTFF2CHRd0 Eac3X9pbN37XBQrBMdPEMlPT5COHB6QM5lnrgLhuOSz8whXDXc8UBsMbZt0gtJo3Qt TqZOVdUkJZmVgQzbi6KSrF2M0l9X7F0wHwef87F53ee/GoK5RoMd3IeHN9cYXRGdfU i9ZHICYTf+J1w== Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 02:11:07 +0000 To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: John Kehayias Subject: Re: bug#74780: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87sepw8zex.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87ed1iqy26.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87y0zrdtwq.fsf@protonmail.com> <87ed1iqy26.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: f6a47bbbd0b61ac762a78ede052fcd41be8c24f1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 74780-done Cc: Efraim Flashner , 74780-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludo=E2=80=99! On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 06:38 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Sure. Please do check the situation at > and how it compares to > =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99. > Yes, I've been keeping an eye on that and by overall percentage (from the Cuirass homepage), the mesa-updates branch has been about equal to master for a while. Though I know the missing stuff is for non-x86 which we get more of from Bordeaux, which is what I usually try to wait for, unfortunately harder to tell without the handy QA page comparison. > You can check that direct dependents of packages that were upgraded > still build fine. For example, =E2=80=9Cguix build -P1 mesa --no-grafts = -n -v1=E2=80=9D > will indicate whether substitutes are available for all of the direct > dependents of =E2=80=98mesa=E2=80=99, meaning that they were successfully= built. > Oh, the new dependents option for guix build, very nice! I hadn't tried it before but this is great. I didn't see something like this built-in (maybe I missed it?) but seems pretty easy to do a comparison then to another branch. I just did the same command on my 'master' worktree and compared, to see just a few minor differences (so I restarted the builds since they didn't have a clear error). A little bash-fu could easily have a nice little comparison between branches using substitute coverage, or maybe we want to add that as an option directly? Maybe specifying two branches or commits to see what package names differ (in hash or substitutes)? > Thanks for working on this! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Most welcome! Merged just now: 23231c296fb2c2af8c1c0a6ead1dd6f0833f7c45 to a65ebe5fad6921dddb165f417761886fc114ad29. Thanks, John From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:05:27 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 12:24:15 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator