GNU bug report logs - #74773
[PATCH] Elaborate doc string for rcirc-next-active-buffer

Previous Next

Full log

Message #19 received at 74773-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: sctb <at> me.com, sdl.web <at> gmail.com, 74773-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#74773: [PATCH] Elaborate doc string for
 rcirc-next-active-buffer
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:19:49 +0200

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: Zaretskii Eli <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  Bell Scott <sctb <at> me.com>,
>   74773 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:31:56 +0000
> 
> Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> On 11 Dec 2024, at 20:21, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:20:04 -0700
> >>> From:  Scott Bell via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >>> 
> >>> I found the current behavior of rcirc-next-active-buffer surprising in
> >>> the case where there is no activity, so I thought it could be described
> >>> in the doc string.
> >> 
> >> Leo and Philip, is this okay to install?
> >
> > After checking all irc buffers with activity, the next rcirc-next-active-buffer returns you back to the buffer where your work is ie non irc buffers.
> >
> > So the patch doesn’t add much though harmless.
> 
> 1+

Thanks, so I've now installed this on the emacs-30 branch, and I'm
closing this bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.