GNU bug report logs - #74773
[PATCH] Elaborate doc string for rcirc-next-active-buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74773: closed ([PATCH] Elaborate doc string for
 rcirc-next-active-buffer)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:21:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:19:49 +0200
with message-id <86o71hywq2.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#74773: [PATCH] Elaborate doc string for rcirc-next-active-buffer
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #74773,
regarding [PATCH] Elaborate doc string for rcirc-next-active-buffer
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
74773: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=74773
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Scott Bell <sctb <at> me.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Elaborate doc string for rcirc-next-active-buffer
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:20:04 -0700

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

I found the current behavior of rcirc-next-active-buffer surprising in
the case where there is no activity, so I thought it could be described
in the doc string.

[0001-lisp-net-rcirc.el-rcirc-next-active-buffer-Doc-strin.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: sctb <at> me.com, sdl.web <at> gmail.com, 74773-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#74773: [PATCH] Elaborate doc string for
 rcirc-next-active-buffer
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:19:49 +0200

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: Zaretskii Eli <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  Bell Scott <sctb <at> me.com>,
>   74773 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:31:56 +0000
> 
> Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> On 11 Dec 2024, at 20:21, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:20:04 -0700
> >>> From:  Scott Bell via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >>> 
> >>> I found the current behavior of rcirc-next-active-buffer surprising in
> >>> the case where there is no activity, so I thought it could be described
> >>> in the doc string.
> >> 
> >> Leo and Philip, is this okay to install?
> >
> > After checking all irc buffers with activity, the next rcirc-next-active-buffer returns you back to the buffer where your work is ie non irc buffers.
> >
> > So the patch doesn’t add much though harmless.
> 
> 1+

Thanks, so I've now installed this on the emacs-30 branch, and I'm
closing this bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.