GNU bug report logs -
#74750
clone-frame and make-frame pixelwise issues
Previous Next
Reported by: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:53:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #38 received at 74750 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 1:15 PM martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at> wrote:
> > Thank you for the patch and continued focus on this. The following is
> the
> > behavior I see on NS with the patch applied with target width 1700 and
> > height 1000. These are results from clone-frame using text-pixels which
> > I've included below without explicit pixelwise argument so it respects
> > frame-resize-pixelwise.
>
> Thank you for conducting these experiments.
>
My pleasure, actually. I live inside Emacs so the better we make it for us
the better for all.
> Note: frame-inhibit-implied-resize=(tab-bar-lines) is the default setting
> > on NS:
> >
> > #if defined (USE_GTK) || defined (HAVE_NS)
> > frame_inhibit_implied_resize = list1 (Qtab_bar_lines);
> >
> > frame-resize-pixelwise=nil frame-inhibit-implied-resize=nil
> text-width=1692
> > (Δ-8) text-height=984 (Δ-16) native-width=1727 (Δ-8) native-height 988
> > (Δ-16)
> >
> > Result: respects lines/cols as expected.
>
> It's problematic to clone a frame made with 'frame-resize-pixelwise'
> non-nil in a setting with 'frame-resize-pixelwise' nil. I always have
> 'frame-resize-pixelwise' t and never change it.
>
As you pointed out, these are experiments and reflect the desire to fully
understand (and control) Emacs behavior under various circumstances we
encounter.
> > frame-resize-pixelwise=t frame-inhibit-implied-resize=(tab-bar-lines)
> > text-width=1700 (Δ0) text-height=1000 (Δ0) native-width=1735 (Δ0)
> > native-height 1004 (Δ0)
> >
> > Result: Okay by accident, I think, only because tab-bar-lines parameter
> is
> > nil during adjust_frame_height invocations?
>
> adjust_frame_size you mean, I suppose. Does your frame have a tab bar?
>
Yes, typo. These results are all under -Q as we need to repro, so no
visible tab bar, just the default NS view which is the tool bar which under
master, now appears on the title bar. Something I didn't notice until today
but it's neither here nor there, I suppose. I disable tool-bar under all my
own real-world circumstances.
> frame-resize-pixelwise=t frame-inhibit-implied-resize=nil text-width=1700
> > (Δ0) text-height=1000 (Δ0) native-width=1735 (Δ0) native-height 1004
> (Δ0)
> >
> > Result: Okay but with frame-inhibit-implied-resize nil, I'd have
> expected
> > rows/cols vs. pixelwise.
>
> Why? 'frame-inhibit-implied-resize' is about _not_ resizing a frame's
> window when one removes/adds one of the items it mentions. It should
> work with pixelwise and normal resizing.
>
I said that because the latest patch respects frame-inhibit-implied-resize
not frame-resize-pixelwise.
> frame-resize-pixelwise=t frame-inhibit-implied-resize=t text-width=1685
> > (Δ-15) text-height=1000 (Δ0) native-width=1720 (Δ-15) native-height 1004
> > (Δ0)
> >
> > Result: I think this case remains broken needing the adjustment from
> your
> > first patch that you wanted to also account for fringes?
>
> 15 is an odd number so it can't be the default fringes. IIUC it's your
> scroll bar which gets set up after the "frame was made" and while
> resizing is inhibited. Note that the fringes are purely Emacs internal
> - we can set them up any way we like. The scroll bar is more difficult
> since the toolkit usually determines its default width. You could try
> to debug this with a breakpoint in 'gui_set_scroll_bar_width' and after
> that one in 'frame_inhibit_resize'. Here on xfwm/GTK-3 the text width
> remains unchanged.
>
Indeed 15 is the vertical scroll bar width. This was what I reported in the
original bug submission. You suggested a patch that would accommodate
fringes, et.al. If you'd like me to make adjustments; e.g., resizing
fringes or whatever, happy to do it and rerun.
These are all ostensively calls to clone-frame. I'd expect, as I guess most
people would, that cloning produces the precise geometry of the originating
frame, scroll bar or not.
> > My default GUI setup is frame-resize-pixelwise t
> > frame-inhibit-implied-resize t as I expect many people have adopted
> these
> > days.
>
> Few people have AFAICT. Note that all these experiments are borderline.
> Cloning a frame should respect the settings that were active at the time
> the original was made. We can try to make it behave reasonably when
> these values change but I am not sure whether we will succeed.
>
Let's try.
-Stephane
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 225 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.