GNU bug report logs - #74736
[PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>

Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:29:02 UTC

Severity: important

Tags: patch

Merged with 66844

Done: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:51:57 +0100
>> Half of the committers is 25 people (based on .guix-authorizations), and
>> a quarter of the team members is 10.  Personnally, I have trouble
>> imagining that this amount of people will come to send a mail to the
>> RFC.
>
> So are you saying you’d want no quorum at all?  (Your revision still
> reads “50% committers”.)

To take a realistic example, say I make an RFC for P2P substitute
distribution with GNUNet/ERIS, this is a big change that requires an RFC
but I have trouble imagining that ten people in the team members are
interested in that.

Teams are specialized after all, if I add myself to the games team it
doesn’t mean I care about RFCs for what would be the core team.

That said I trust your experience to find a quorum that works and if you
think ten is realistic then go for it.

>> Lastly, do we want to move the RFCs to a separate git repository?
>
> I think so.  I’ll ask for it on Savannah.
>

Great!

Have a nice day,
Noé




This bug report was last modified 89 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.