GNU bug report logs - #74736
[PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #276 received at 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: GNU Guix maintainers <guix-maintainers <at> gnu.org>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>,
 pukkamustard <pukkamustard <at> posteo.net>,
 Noé Lopez <noelopez <at> free.fr>, bokr <at> bokr.com,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>,
 Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>, Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>,
 Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>,
 Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel <at> crazy-compilers.com>,
 "Artyom V. Poptsov" <poptsov.artyom <at> gmail.com>, 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247 <at> gmail.com>,
 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#74736: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:47:32 +0900

Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Just one note:
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>> The GCD process is a mechanism to determine whether a proposed change is
>>> “significant” enough to require attention from the community at large
>>
>> Why quote "significant" ?
>
> To me, this is to emphasize that what is meant by “significant” will be
> clarified below.

OK.  That wasn't clear to me.  I'd suggest wording that explicitly, for
example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[...] a proposed change is "significant" (which meaning is clarified
below)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

or similar.

> (Thanks for all the other comments and suggestions!)

My pleasure!

Happy 2025!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.