GNU bug report logs -
#74736
[PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.
Previous Next
Reported by: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:29:02 UTC
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Merged with 66844
Done: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #27 received at 74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>> +** Decision making: consensus
>>
>> … and drop this.
>
> I think it makes more sense to have the Decision Making as RFC and then
> the manual refers to it, and not the converse. ;-)
>
> Therefore, I would keep the section here. And once we are done, letting
> the manual as-is, I would link to RFC.
>
> What defines the Decision Making *is* RFC and not the manual. ;-)
Earlier, I wrote:
> I would add “General day-to-day contributions follow the regular
> [decision-making process] and [team organization].”, with references to
> the relevant sections of the manual.
Since (1) day-to-day contributions do not follow the RFC process and (2)
teams and consensus-based decision making are already defined (and went
through peer review), I think it makes more sense to build on these two
sections we already have.
>>> +* Unresolved questions
>>
>> I think these two sections in the context of this foundational document
>> look a bit ridiculous. :-) But maybe that’s okay?
>
> I think that the first RFC must respects what it asks to other RFC. ;-)
>
> And if the consensus is not reached, we need a place to summarize the
> unresolved discussion, no?
I already mentioned it back in February, FWIW:
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66844#3-lineno186>.
Anyway, no big deal, but it will certainly look strange eventually.
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 90 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.