GNU bug report logs - #74736
[PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>

Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:29:02 UTC

Severity: important

Tags: patch

Merged with 66844

Done: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: reza <reza <at> housseini.me>, "74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <74736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, "ludo <at> gnu.org" <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Noé Lopez <noe <at> xn--no-cja.eu>, Noé Lopez <noelopez <at> free.fr>, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: [bug#74736] [PATCH v6] Add Request-for-Comments process.
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:39:50 +0100
Hi Reza,

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 12:15, reza via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:

>                           I don't see this mention in the document?

Well, I think it’s covered with the term “sequence number” and with the
information provided by the 000-template.md.

    id: <the next available number>

>                                                                     Also
> will this mean we only can do 999 RFC's?

Well, this document will be amended a couple of times before we are
close to have 999 GCDs, I guess. :-) Therefore, we will refine depending
on how it goes.

Moreover, considering the changes that would have required such process
from the 10+ past years, I think we have some time for preparing the
case of 999 before we reach it. :-)

Cheers,
simon

PS: Fun: “sequence number” could be a Fibonacci sequence number… Even,
    it could be let to the author as an exercise to determine which
    “sequence” the project is following. ;-)





This bug report was last modified 89 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.